whether something that has passed over the VTAM API from TSO
> >> actually appears as an Ethernet frame.
> >>
> >> As a comparison, you could do the same, that is, a VTAM buffer trace and
> >> running Wireshark, with D NET,APING,SIZE=1920,ITER=1. (ITER=1 for
can see whether something that has passed over the VTAM API from TSO
> >> actually appears as an Ethernet frame.
> >>
> >> As a comparison, you could do the same, that is, a VTAM buffer trace and
> >> running Wireshark, with D NET,APING,SIZE=1920,ITER=1. (ITER
Hello Chris !
Yes I confirm that I use LU0. There are LOCAL NO SNA terminals, i.e.: Dialed
terminals to z/OS guest ( we are under VM).
So, I will configure and test with TCPIP. I have the same problem with VSE and
VM, but the terminals are also dialed ( local! ).
Stay tuned :-)
Thank You,
Norbe
bert Alfred Müller
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Chris!
>> >
>> >tests are ongoing , but here some results:
>> >
>> >- I read in the manual about MAXDATA in a node 2.1. AND I tested, also.
>> Without results: MAXDATA is always 1498 :-(
esults: MAXDATA is always 1498 :-(
> >- D NET,APING, works with all sizes, also with 16384.
> >- If MAXDATA 1498 is an absolute NO, the question is: how is getting VTAM
> this size ? from Network definition ? or is the size correct and the display
> no ?
> >What
? or is the size correct and the display no
?
>What do you thing about a trace with wireshark ?
>
>
>Regards,
>Norbert.
>
>
>> Von: "Chris Mason"
>> Gesendet: 26.04.09 13:34:02
>> An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>> Betreff: Re: APPN Connection z/os -
getting VTAM this
size ? from Network definition ? or is the size correct and the display no ?
What do you thing about a trace with wireshark ?
Regards,
Norbert.
> Von: "Chris Mason"
> Gesendet: 26.04.09 13:34:02
> An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Betreff: Re: APPN Connect
Norbert
Thanks for the information.
I misunderstood what you meant by "before the whole screen comes". This
implied that you session stopped for a while and then continued. Perhaps you
should have said "before the whole screen would have come, if it had
continued working". So it really is a pe
Hello Chris !
first of all, thank you for your detailed answer !!!
The nodes are defined as NN and with HPR=NO, is a simulation and after that we
must connect a VSE with z/OS, this is the reason for HPR=NO.
I guess in my problem is irrelevant, because the same nodes work ok with ANNC
connections
Norbert
Note that from the time of support for MPC CTC in devices such as the 2216,
the term AHHC was formally changed to ANNC, that is, "host to host"
became "node to node" for obvious reasons.
Have you defined both your APPN nodes as Network Nodes? The simplest
configuration is to have one N
Hi all!
I hope this is a trivial question for the SNA gurus :-)
I have two nodes with z/OS ( 1.5, ADCD) , NN, linked with MPC CTC, TRL, and so
on. Very Easy, I access from the system B to TSO in system A, everything is Ok.
When I make the same with XCA ( Ethernet ) and Sw Major Node, The Logon f
11 matches
Mail list logo
