On 31 May 2010 10:08:25 -0700, zedgarhoo...@gmail.com (zMan) wrote:
>After cleverly changing their name from "Computer Associates" to "CA"
>several years ago, CA has again renamed itself, this time to "CA
>Technologies". The first renaming was claimed to be to "Improve brand
>perception" (because,
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> In all seriousness I believe the most recent rename was because they
> discovered that Google searches for CA tended to turn up mostly references
> to California and a few to Cocaine Anonymous.
>
I'd believe that, only sheesh, it's only bee
Indeed...my theory is that they've been taken over by Lolcats!
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
> A google search for CAT will be so much better? ;)
>
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Anonymous.
>
> Charles
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
> Of zMan
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:07 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: CA rebrands again!
>
> After cleverly changing th
Behalf
Of zMan
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CA rebrands again!
After cleverly changing their name from "Computer Associates" to "CA"
several years ago, CA has again renamed itself, this time to "CA
Technologies". The first
After cleverly changing their name from "Computer Associates" to "CA"
several years ago, CA has again renamed itself, this time to "CA
Technologies". The first renaming was claimed to be to "Improve brand
perception" (because, of course, folks wouldn't associate "CA" with whatever
negative associat
6 matches
Mail list logo
