Re: Command Technology and SPF/SE - Alive and Well!

2009-05-10 Thread Graham Hobbs
I too complained about the switch from REXX to C - got me nowhere. Was not happy but the constant hangups in V4 forced me to V6 and a rudimentary learning of C. There's a couple of other not so pleasant things in V6 too, e.g. in 3.4 putting a 'b'rowse on multiple members and it presents from the

Re: Command Technology and SPF/SE - Alive and Well!

2009-05-10 Thread Rick Fochtman
That's nice to know, but I keep the old SPF/PC for one very important (to me, at least) reason: REXX support. I can develop a REXX exec at home and xfer it immediately to my mainframe ISPF environment and know that it will work identically in both locations. And that's saved me a LOT of time.

Re: Command Technology and SPF/SE - Alive and Well!

2009-05-09 Thread David Kreiss
William Smith Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 7:10 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Command Technology and SPF/SE - Alive and Well! Command Technology and its current product SPF/SE (not SPF/PC) is alive and well.  The company has relocated from Alameda, CA, to Sun City West, AZ.  I still have my

Command Technology and SPF/SE - Alive and Well!

2009-05-09 Thread William Smith
Command Technology and its current product SPF/SE (not SPF/PC) is alive and well.  The company has relocated from Alameda, CA, to Sun City West, AZ.  I still have my copy of SPF/PC 4.07 along with all of the service disks - now archived on a CD.  I have the complete set of manuals, too, in prist