/2007t.html#61 Re: Crypto Related Posts
some recent related:
Why should merchants keep credit card data?
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/120607-why-should-merchants-keep-credit.html
the proposed approach was raised at least a decade ago ... it addresses
harvesting data-at-rest in repostories
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:24:39 -0500, Wayne Driscoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
Actually, that would be Ms Choi on RACF-L.
Yes, she's very good, but I think Wai deals primarily with digital
certificate and PKI questions, not crypto in general.
--
Walt
:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Crypto Related Posts
Mr. Choi on RACF-L
If IBM's crypto development lab has a Frank Yaeger clone, I've not
seen anything from him/her on the list yet. Or maybe I have, but
failed
to recognize her/him (maybe s/he is encrypted!).
-jc
@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Crypto Related Posts
Dave,
Actually, that would be Ms Choi on RACF-L.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
,
fortunately I was able to save the keys for the production lpar ...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 7:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Crypto Related Posts
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:51:43 -0500, Bob Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And I have long wondered: SYS1.SAMPLIB(CSFTEST) exists on some of our
systems, but not others. This seems to be random, not correlated with OS
release (although it's available on our 1.9 system).
In our shop it's available
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Crypto Related Posts
(in my best Seinfeld voice)...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any
reason
why suddenly
Must be nice to be untouched by this
I was affect as far back as 1990, working for a bank.
We used 4753's, which were PC/AT's with a channel to channel connection.
And, you could only do 50 security calls per second.
I think one chip on a z/990 can do almost 12,000.
-
Too busy driving to stop
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:06:21 -0600, Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must be nice to be untouched by this :-)
This is not sudden: many of us have been dancing with this bear for a
year or two now. We have mandates to increase security to reduce
identity theft and fraud.
The bar gets higher
Not untouched... been running ICSF since z900 years ago.
We went from 4753's, to 9672-Rn6, to z/900, at the Bank I worked at.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
(in my best Seinfeld voice)...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any reason
why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are working on it at the same time?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group
-Original Message-
From: Mark Zelden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Crypto Related Posts
(in my best Seinfeld voice)...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any
reason why
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
(in my best Seinfeld voice)...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-)
Seriously... any reason why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are
working on it at the same time?
Probably just
In our case it's the PCI (Payment Card Industry) i.e. VISA requiring
protection of card numbers that is driving our interest (as well as the
large $$$ penalties for not complying.
Alan
-Original Message-
(in my best Seinfeld voice)...
What's up with all these crypto related posts
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jack Kelly
snip
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-)
Seriously... any reason
why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are working on it at the same
time?
unsnip
I would assume that a lot of us
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:56:55 -0600, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any
reason
why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are working on it at the same
time?
...
Judging from the responses so far, this is must be coincidence plus
light on this when
these questions come up.
Bill Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:09:35 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
Re: Crypto Related Posts To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU snip What's up with
all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any reason why suddenly so
many IBM-MAINers are working
snip
What's up with all these crypto related posts? :-) Seriously... any
reason
why suddenly so many IBM-MAINers are working on it at the same
time?
unsnip
I would assume that a lot of us are in the same boat, ie like Unix was,
crypto is something that has slowly crept into our lives
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick O'Keefe) writes:
We've been moving towards secure data transmissions with business
partners (with testing starting in about a week)
Hopefully IBM has taken notice and has some of their crypto people
viewing these threads and respond - hopefully as well as DFSORT personnel
The IBM crypto expert is Ernie Nachtigal (Canada).
I don't believe he monitors this forum.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Chase, John wrote:
---SNIP---
If IBM's crypto development lab has a Frank Yaeger clone, I've not
seen anything from him/her on the list yet. Or maybe I have, but
failed
to recognize her/him (maybe s/he
Yes, I am now back monitoring
Ernest
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:53:10 -0600, Ernest Nachtigall wrote:
Yes, I am now back monitoring
Thanks. Naturally I can hardly help wondering whether
you (re)appeared so suddenly by enormous coincidence
or whether some daemon monitors this list to notify you
of any use of your name?
And I have
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:31:47 -0600, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:53:10 -0600, Ernest Nachtigall wrote:
Yes, I am now back monitoring
Thanks. Naturally I can hardly help wondering whether
you (re)appeared so suddenly by enormous coincidence
or whether some
And I have long wondered: SYS1.SAMPLIB(CSFTEST) exists on some of our
systems, but not others. This seems to be random, not correlated with OS
release (although it's available on our 1.9 system).
In our shop it's available in 1.7. 1.8 and 1.9.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
25 matches
Mail list logo
