On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:33:29 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I understand that the CPACF instructions are just that - single
instructions. But so are AR, MVCL, and CFC - quite a range.
(I'm guessing that CFC takes a long time to execute. It's
description takes a long time to
Is there any doc comparing performance of crypto functions using
the encryption hardware vs the same functions using software?
I've seen a paper showing the performance of both CPACF and CEX2
based on block sizes (very big differences) but not compared to
with software-only. I've also seen a
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:58:53 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any doc comparing performance of crypto functions using
the encryption hardware vs the same functions using software?
I've seen a paper showing the performance of both CPACF and CEX2
based on block sizes (very
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:46:59 -0600, Ernest Nachtigall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much for joining the discussion. I'm afaid you're
going to be swamped with questions for a while.
... Fo CPACF, is is a single OP code so beats
software routines thousands to one (TDES ASM routine has
4 matches
Mail list logo
