On 8/24/07, Jim McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I presume you use the VSAM component names as opposed to the cluster
> name. I keep getting -
>
> RESTORE DS(INC(QMF311.DSQPNLE.DATA)) -
> 00130099
> INDDNAME(BACKUP) -
> 00170099
> OUTDYNAM(WRKP01)
> 00171099
> DR101I (R/I)
>From DFSMSdss Storage Administration Guide
Document Number SC35-0423-06
3.1.2 Physical Processing
2. The RENAME and RENAMEUNCONDITIONAL keywords are ignored for VSAM data
sets during physical restore.
DFSMSdss performs physical processing when the following conditions
exist:
You specify the
A rename will work if the backup was in "LOGICAL" format, but will fail
if the backup is in "PHYSICAL" format.
A "PHYSICAL" format backup will be created if you use the "FULL"
keyword.
We perform Full Volume Backups Weekly on selective DASD volumes using
both
FDR and DFDSS. We have also restor
Where's Bruce Black when we need him? Haven't heard anything from him
in a while.
Hi Guys and Gals. I've been out of action for a while (don't ask) so I
have not been keeping up with IBM-MAIN. I hope to get back to it soon!!
--
Bruce Black
Senior Software Developer
Innovation Data Proces
In a message dated 8/24/2007 4:17:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or maybe he defected ... ;-)
>>
Hmmm, I guess all things are possible. Just didn't seem like a Center 42
type guy!
_http://www.lyricsfreak.com/r/rolling+stones/undercover+of+the+night_20117885.
Ed Finnell wrote:
Yeah, I was just lamenting the same thing. Wonder if he got stuck in San
Diego?
Or maybe he defected ... ;-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixso
In a message dated 8/24/2007 11:08:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where's Bruce Black when we need him? Haven't heard anything from him
in a while.
>>
Yeah, I was just lamenting the same thing. Wonder if he got stuck in San
Diego?
*
-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS versus FDR
It's been a while but I am pretty sure I did the component names.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
It's been a while but I am pretty sure I did the component names.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS versus FDR
On 8/24/07, Po
007 12:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS versus FDR
On 8/24/07, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> QMF311.DSQPNLE.DATA?? Are you sure that's not the data component?
> I woud expect you to be using the cluster name with the Spher
On 8/24/07, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> QMF311.DSQPNLE.DATA?? Are you sure that's not the data component?
> I woud expect you to be using the cluster name with the Sphere parameter.
David, thanks that worked although I would have put money on the fact that I
ha
QMF311.DSQPNLE.DATA?? Are you sure that's not the data component?
I woud expect you to be using the cluster name with the Sphere parameter.
Jim McAlpine wrote
I presume you use the VSAM component names as opposed to the cluster name. I
keep getting -
RESTORE DS(INC(QMF311.DSQPNLE.DATA)) -
00130
On 8/24/07, Pommier, Rex R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We also do full volume backups using DFDSS and have done single VSAM
> dataset restores from the backup tapes.
>
> Rex
I presume you use the VSAM component names as opposed to the cluster name. I
keep getting -
RESTORE DS(INC(QMF311.DSQP
Subject: Re: DFDSS versus FDR
We perform Full Volume Backups Weekly on selective DASD volumes using
both FDR and DFDSS. We have also restored (and renamed) a VSAM file
(NON-Multi
volume) from the backup tape using both products
We perform Full Volume Backups Weekly on selective DASD volumes using both
FDR and DFDSS. We have also restored (and renamed) a VSAM file (NON-Multi
volume) from the backup tape using both products.
**
I believe that you c
I believe that you can restore, you just can't perform a rename while
doing it.
>
>As I read it, and my experience, is that you cannot restore any type of
>VSAM dataset from a full volume backup.
>
---
This e-mail is
I guess I should stop doing it then.
>snip
As I read it, and my experience, is that you cannot restore any type of
VSAM dataset from a full volume backup.
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Inform
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 11:06 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: DFDSS versus FDR
>
>
> On 7/20/07, McKown, Joh
On 7/20/07, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> DFDSS can restore single volume sequential and PDS datasets from a full
> volume backup. It cannot restore multivolume sequential or VSAM from a
> full volume backup.
>
> --
John,
Do you mean by the above that DFDSS cannot restore any V
cussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
McKown, John
Envoyé : vendredi 20 juillet 2007 17:15
À : IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Objet : Re: DFDSS versus FDR
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
> S
Kenneth, just to give a bit more background, we are a development shop
running Flex_ES and z/OS on an IBM x-Series machine for COBOL/CICS/DB2
development. We have around 250 GB of disk and our backups are currently
done to a Super DLT drive that gives a maximum backup of 320GB with 2:1
compressi
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:15:26 -0500, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
>> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:11 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA
.
Luis Monge
Advisory Software Engineer
SUN Microsystems
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DFDSS versus FDR
Many
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:11 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: DFDSS versus FDR
>
>
> Many moons ago I had access to the FDR products
Many moons ago I had access to the FDR products for backup and recovery but
now I only have DFDSS. As I remember, one of the big differentiators at the
time was that with FDR you could do a dataset restore (including VSAM
datasets) from a full volume physical dump but that wasn't possible with
D
25 matches
Mail list logo
