Re: DS6800 and OS/390 2.9

2011-09-15 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2011-09-15 10:26, Brian Westerman wrote: [...] you cannot use a 9672 (or anything older than a z/800). [...] we were "told" that it wouldn't work, we never really got a chance to test it. I do believe that it "probably" would not have worked on the 9672 though. Well... The above is no

Re: DS6800 and OS/390 2.9

2011-09-15 Thread Brian Westerman
You can use the DS/6xxx under OS/390 (back to 2.7), but you cannot use some of the DS/6xxx features. You also MUST use system Z hardware (i.e. z-series), you cannot use a 9672 (or anything older than a z/800). We ran fine with a customer converting on a z/800 with OS/390 2.7 who converted fr

Re: DS6800 and OS/390 2.9

2011-09-14 Thread Pinnacle
On 9/13/2011 5:38 PM, Carlos Bodra - Pessoal wrote: Hello List Gurus. We are in process of migrate from an ancient IBM 2105-F20 with 1TB of legacy mainframe data to a IBM 1750-522 (DS6800). Both subsystems has volumes defined as 3390-3 and no software features (flashcopy, pprc etc..) used in

Re: DS6800 and OS/390 2.9

2011-09-14 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2011-09-13 23:37, Carlos Bodra - Pessoal pisze: Hello List Gurus. We are in process of migrate from an ancient IBM 2105-F20 with 1TB of legacy mainframe data to a IBM 1750-522 (DS6800). Both subsystems has volumes defined as 3390-3 and no software features (flashcopy, pprc etc..) used in

DS6800 and OS/390 2.9

2011-09-13 Thread Carlos Bodra - Pessoal
Hello List Gurus. We are in process of migrate from an ancient IBM 2105-F20 with 1TB of legacy mainframe data to a IBM 1750-522 (DS6800). Both subsystems has volumes defined as 3390-3 and no software features (flashcopy, pprc etc..) used in Shark and will neither in DS6800. My question is, a