Hello,
Other than using SMS, is anyone aware of a system setting or JCL parameter
that would bias the allocation of a disk dataset toward a range of volumes
within a pool defined by esoteric ?
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / si
Hi, Tim,
other than using SMS or a vendor product, e.g., BMC MAINVIEW SRM Allocation, I
don't know of any way of directing the allocation of non-VSAM datasets to a pool
or subpool of disks. In my shop, we've been using the BMC product I mentioned
for many years and we couldn't run our production jo
On Friday 10 February 2006 11:23, Tim Hupe wrote:
> Other than using SMS, .
Pardon my asking, but SMS has been around since 1989 and it's a standard
component of all OS/390 and z/OS systems. Any particular reason why
you're not using it?
--
Gilbert Saint-Flour
GSF Software
http://gsf
Other than using SMS, is anyone aware of a system setting or JCL parameter
that would bias the allocation of a disk dataset toward a range of volumes
within a pool defined by esoteric ?
Depends on what you mean by "bias". If you define an esoteric name to a
group of disk devices, and do allocat
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Disk dataset allocation within a pool defined by esoteric
Hello,
Other than using SMS, is anyone aware of a system setting or JCL
parameter that would bias the allocation of a disk dataset toward a
range of volumes within a
only way i've done it is by coding the dasd exit which isn't too bad. sms
is easier though
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
there is VATLSTxx, and there are these DADSM exits
- ravi.
Tim Hupe wrote:
Hello,
Other than using SMS, is anyone aware of a system setting or JCL parameter
that would bias the allocation of a disk dataset toward a range of volumes
within a pool defined by esoteric ?
Thanks
fear of the unknown ...
at my previous work site, the STGADMIN gods simply refused to
believe in SMS, because of some "past bad experiences"; i'd guessed
they didn't set it up properly then.
- ravi.
Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:
On Friday 10 February 2006 11:23, Tim Hupe wrote:
Other than us
On Feb 10, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Ambat Ravi Nair wrote:
fear of the unknown ...
at my previous work site, the STGADMIN gods simply refused to
believe in SMS, because of some "past bad experiences"; i'd guessed
they didn't set it up properly then.
- ravi.
I was at another installation and they
ences."
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ed Gould
> Sent: Saturday, 11 February 2006 11:13 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Disk dataset allocation within a pool defined by esoteric
&
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote:
Ed,
I had the pleasure of visiting a shop in Jakarta where I helped
them convert
to SMS 5 years ago. These guys were so in touch with their
requirements that
the ACS routines, Classes and STORGRUPS are 99% unchanged after half a
dec
augh
DTS Software
Tech Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ambat Ravi Nair
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Disk dataset allocation within a pool defined by esoteric
there is VATLS
12 matches
Mail list logo
