: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Dynamic Allocation 1.9 - 1.11?
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:19:31 -0700, Lester, Bob
bles...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:
We've uncovered a difference in Dynamic Allocation behavior between
z/OS 1.9 and z/OS 1.11 in our location
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:27:00 -0700, Lester, Bob
bles...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for all the replies on this one.
It turned out to be a missed USERMOD for LE, and the CBLQDA setting
in particular.
DOH!
Thanks!
Bob Lester
Hi Bob,
I personally hate that option and
appropriate testing, of course!. :-)
Thanks again!
BobL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Doug Henry
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 11:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Dynamic Allocation 1.9 - 1.11
IBM does not refuse to look into a difference when it's undocumented, no
matter what your previous release was. Possibly you need to go back and
present the issue again. I suppose that it's possible that you were dealing
with someone who was inexperienced in how to handle the problem. If they
Bob,
Does your problem have anything to do with dynamic allocation of GDG's?
We also discovered a change in behaivor in dynamic allocation as we migrated
to z/OS 1.11. Our situation was related to using SVC99 to allocate GDG
datasets, the code was placing the entire dataset name including
Hi Folks,
We've uncovered a difference in Dynamic Allocation behavior between
z/OS 1.9 and z/OS 1.11 in our location.
A vendor software package does dynamic allocation from a program -
for an //ERRORS DD in this case. This batch job works fine under under
1.9, but abends under
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:19:31 -0700, Lester, Bob
bles...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:
We've uncovered a difference in Dynamic Allocation behavior between
z/OS 1.9 and z/OS 1.11 in our location.
A vendor software package does dynamic allocation from a program -
for an //ERRORS DD in this
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:19:31 -0700 Lester, Bob
bles...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:
:We've uncovered a difference in Dynamic Allocation behavior between
:z/OS 1.9 and z/OS 1.11 in our location.
:A vendor software package does dynamic allocation from a program -
:for an //ERRORS DD in this
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Dynamic Allocation 1.9 - 1.11?
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:19:31 -0700 Lester, Bob
bles...@oppenheimerfunds.com wrote:
:We've uncovered a difference in Dynamic Allocation behavior
between
:z/OS 1.9 and z/OS 1.11 in our location.
:A vendor software package does dynamic
9 matches
Mail list logo
