Steve Comstock wrote:
Steve Comstock wrote:
Bill Klein wrote:
I may be missing something, but if you know at compile-time (when you
can
set an environment variable) that you want the output to go to
SYSOUT, why
are you using files (with OPEN, WRITE, etc) and not just doing a
DISPLAY
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:01:20 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:08:48 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
DISPLAY always goes to DDName SYSOUT, which can be a data
set or a spooled data set (SYSOUT=x).
The OP has a need for the output to go to a DD that will not contain other
Steve Comstock wrote:
Bill Klein wrote:
I may be missing something, but if you know at compile-time (when you can
set an environment variable) that you want the output to go to
SYSOUT, why
are you using files (with OPEN, WRITE, etc) and not just doing a
DISPLAY
statement? Either that or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: SYSOUT dynamic allocation in COBOL
Steve Comstock wrote:
Bill Klein wrote:
I may
Krueger
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 09:47
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: SYSOUT dynamic allocation in COBOL
Steve Comstock wrote:
snipped
OK. Today I took some time
Ulrich Krueger wrote:
Steve,
There's just one fly in the ointment that I'd like to point out ...
If you create *one* file containing *multiple* email messages and send it to
SYSOUT=(B,SMTP) ... I mean, yes, it'll work, but it'll tie up the SMTP task
and cause performance problems if your SMTP
problems, no more nasty calls from users.
Regards,
Ulrich Krueger
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:57
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: SYSOUT dynamic allocation in COBOL
2009/3/17 Ulrich Krueger u...@pacbell.net:
Glad to hear that this is a non-issue for your shop, Steve.
I just felt like I had to climb up on my soap-box and point this potential
pitfall out to you as well as to the rest of the user community so they
don't have to suffer through the same issues
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Tony Harminc
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 11:40
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: SYSOUT dynamic allocation in COBOL
snipped
Shouldn't someone fix the SMTP server instead...?
Tony
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:39:50 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
2009/3/17 Ulrich Krueger:
At my shop, when I was finally able to pinpoint where the SMTP performance
problems originated from, I was lucky. A single JCL-procedure was used to
create the mass-mail file(s). So, instead of sending it
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:18:11 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:39:50 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
2009/3/17 Ulrich Krueger:
At my shop, when I was finally able to pinpoint where the SMTP performance
problems originated from, I was lucky. A single
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:25:06 -0500, John McKown wrote:
Shouldn't someone fix the SMTP server instead...?
Would sendmail be better? If so, it might be time to
replace SMTP, even if only with a spool writer that feeds
sendmail -toi.
Does XMITIP have options to use either sendmail or SMTP?
--
task which reads
from spool.
Hartmut
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] Im Auftrag von
Paul Gilmartin
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. März 2009 23:00
An: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Betreff: Re: [IBM-MAIN] FW: SYSOUT dynamic allocation
I may be missing something, but if you know at compile-time (when you can
set an environment variable) that you want the output to go to SYSOUT, why
are you using files (with OPEN, WRITE, etc) and not just doing a DISPLAY
statement? Either that or call CEEMSG.
I think those are more normal ways
Bill Klein wrote:
I may be missing something, but if you know at compile-time (when you can
set an environment variable) that you want the output to go to SYSOUT, why
are you using files (with OPEN, WRITE, etc) and not just doing a DISPLAY
statement? Either that or call CEEMSG.
I think those
On 16 Mar 2009 12:06:42 -0700, wmkl...@ix.netcom.com (Bill Klein)
wrote:
I may be missing something, but if you know at compile-time (when you can
set an environment variable) that you want the output to go to SYSOUT, why
are you using files (with OPEN, WRITE, etc) and not just doing a DISPLAY
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:03:59 -0500, Bill Klein wrote:
I may be missing something, but if you know at compile-time (when you can
set an environment variable) that you want the output to go to SYSOUT, why
are you using files (with OPEN, WRITE, etc) and not just doing a DISPLAY
statement? Either
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:03:59 -0500, Bill Klein wrote:
I may be missing something, but if you know at compile-time (when you can
set an environment variable) that you want the output to go to SYSOUT, why
are you using files (with OPEN, WRITE, etc) and not just doing a
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:03:59 -0500, Bill Klein wrote:
I may be missing something, but if you know at compile-time (when you can
set an environment variable) that you want the output to go to SYSOUT, why
are you using files (with OPEN, WRITE, etc) and not just doing a DISPLAY
statement? Either
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:08:48 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:03:59 -0500, Bill Klein wrote:
I may be missing something, but if you know at compile-time (when you can
set an environment variable) that you want the output to go to SYSOUT, why
are you using files (with OPEN,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: SYSOUT dynamic allocation in COBOL
SNIP
(DDName SYSOUT? Not SYSPRINT? Not SYSTERM? COBOL
21 matches
Mail list logo
