Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-07 Thread Eric Vaughan -- illustro Systems
** > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ed Finnell > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:03 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Good article on &

Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-07 Thread Baron Carter
http://www.arcati.com/dino.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.htm

Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-07 Thread Greg Shirey
As far as I can tell, it has not been updated this century. However, the site now has this disclaimer: You have requested information that is part of the ACTS Archives. While this information is several years old, it has been retained on our website by popular demand. Please be advised that much

Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-07 Thread Ted MacNEIL
... >> Are you aware of reboothill? ... Has it been updated recently? It seems to be at least 3 years since anything was added to it. -teD (The secret to success is sincerity. If you can fake that, you've got it made!) -- For

Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-07 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 6/7/2005 8:00:09 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, please see www.illustro.com/mainframeconversions.htm. Here we have started an archive chronicling some less than successful conversions away from the mainframe. >> Are you aware of reboothill

Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-07 Thread Eric Vaughan -- illustro Systems
** > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Steve Comstock > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:20 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead&quo

Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-06 Thread Charles Mills
Thanks, all. I sent him the 1185 article below. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead&quo

Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-06 Thread Steve Comstock
Charles Mills wrote: I'm looking for one good, recent (last 12 months?) article I could send to someone who said to me "you mean companies are still using mainframes? Is anyone still making new ones?" The man in question is quite technical but obviously enterprise IT (and even computers specif

Re: Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-06 Thread Knutson, Sam
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Good article on "mainframe not dead"? I'm looking for one good, recent (last 12 months?) article I could send to someone who said to me "you mean companies are still using mainframes? Is anyone still mak

Good article on "mainframe not dead"?

2005-06-06 Thread Charles Mills
I'm looking for one good, recent (last 12 months?) article I could send to someone who said to me "you mean companies are still using mainframes? Is anyone still making new ones?" The man in question is quite technical but obviously enterprise IT (and even computers specifically) is not his field