On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:01:59 -0400 Mark Jacobs
wrote:
:>Off the top of my head it sounds like the SAF call that Hour Glass is
:>making is including garbage in the field. Have you checked with the vendor?
I agree. Looks like the resource name length is incorrect.
:>On 08/16/11 13:50, Paul Strau
By dumping the SMF data for that time frame and looking at the Resource
report, that would verify what Mark has suggested.
On 8/16/2011 2:01 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Off the top of my head it sounds like the SAF call that Hour Glass is
making is including garbage in the field. Have you checked wi
Off the top of my head it sounds like the SAF call that Hour Glass is
making is including garbage in the field. Have you checked with the vendor?
Mark Jacobs
On 08/16/11 13:50, Paul Strauss wrote:
Hi All,
We are working on an upgrade of Hour Glass from V5.2 to V6.1 and are having
trouble with
Hi All,
We are working on an upgrade of Hour Glass from V5.2 to V6.1 and are having
trouble with the access rules. We have Facility rules defined for the
following. These are as list for a RACF site from the security member that
came with the product. I do not have access to ACF2 for rule changes
4 matches
Mail list logo