-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
I'm getting an error message when I sign on this morning.
We're sorry, there has been a problem while signing in.
Please try again later.
Is anyone else getting the same message?
Same result here
I'm on, no problems (yet).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLINK down again?
I'm getting an error message when I sign on this morning
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:47:38 -0500, Mark Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm getting an error message when I sign on this morning.
We're sorry, there has been a problem while signing in. Please try
again later.
Is anyone else getting the same message?
I was. Closed all my browser windows,
I'm getting an error message when I sign on this morning.
We're sorry, there has been a problem while signing in. Please try
again later.
Is anyone else getting the same message?
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
Riley: Find the next number in the sequence: 313, 331, 367,
Jacobs
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 09:48
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLINK down again?
I'm getting an error message when I sign on this morning.
We're sorry, there has been a problem while signing in. Please try
again later.
Is anyone else getting the same message?
--
Mark Jacobs
I got in no problem.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLINK down again?
I'm getting an error message when I sign on this morning
In a message dated 1/17/2008 9:26:17 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Considering the volume of messages when the link goes down, I figure these
would be far more rare (and noticeable) alternative...
Yeah, could even have an automaton do it automagically?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLink down again second time today SEV1 Ticket# 33639291
IBMLink is down for the second time today
In a message dated 11/1/2007 8:32:07 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps this one needs to be dropped on the US Congress critters? I
can't tell you the grief that has been suffered this week because of the
time change being moved a week, updates to systems either
IBMLink is down for the second time today and not a good day for this
nonsense as the software gods have been very angry the last week. Being
deprived for IBMLink for extended periods and after hours is like being
put back into the support stone age:-(
SEV1 Ticket# 33639291
Best
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Was this west coast time?
ETA now 10:15
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Hello Radoslaw,
And if IBM actually released the full IBM-LINK service to the rest of the world
you also would become addicted to it.
Although I work in Singapore, through a set of circumstances, I have access
to IBMLINK and it does enhance my ability to support the systems I am
responsible
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
[ snip many good examples ]
Occasionally I may go a week or two without using IBMLink,
but when I need it, I need it ASAP.
One might say IBMLink is like insurance: When you need it, you need
it
In a message dated 8/1/2007 11:43:56 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Spoke with IBM this morning regarding the nature of the problem. It is
directly related to the sign-on process...which is NOT on a z/System.
The data continues to reside there but not the sign-on
snip
If the web access is not on a z system, should it be a candidate for a
Reboot Hill story.
/snip
Spoke with IBM this morning regarding the nature of the problem. It is
directly related to the sign-on process...which is NOT on a z/System.
The data continues to reside there but not the
Wow. It looks like the parrot isn't dead after all.
--
Mark Jacobs
Technical Services
Time Customer Service - Tampa, FL
--
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing.
If you can fake that, you've got it made.
-- Julius (Groucho) Henry Marx
and I won't say the other comment, I promise.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Robert Justice wrote:
and I won't say the other comment, I promise.
Out of curiosity:
IBMlink is down again. So WHAT ?
I work everyday with mainframes, I use some IBM web services, like
ShopzSeries, but I have no interest to visit IBMlink.
IBMlink (un)availability has completely no meaning
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: web IBMLINK down again - so what ?
Robert Justice wrote:
and I won't say the other comment, I promise.
Out
it has no meaning for me either, since I use the 3270 interface, oops !
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:49:26 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm missing by not using IBMlink ???
Opening PMRs electronically. Seeing updates to existing PMRs
electronically. Opening ETRs (questions) electronically. Seeing updates
to ETRs electronically. (ETR)
Problem diagnosis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Robert Justice wrote:
and I won't say the other comment, I promise.
Out of curiosity:
IBMlink is down again.
On 31 Jul 2007 07:54:10 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Out of curiosity:
IBMlink is down again. So WHAT ?
I work everyday with mainframes, I use some IBM web services, like
ShopzSeries, but I have no interest to visit IBMlink.
IBMlink (un)availability has completely no meaning for me.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
and I won't say the other comment, I promise.
This habitual non-availability of the intended sole customer interface
to IBMLink has gone so far past ridiculous that an adequate adjective to
describe it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: web IBMLINK down again -SEV1 32656350
SNIP
Perhaps the time is coming for influential customers to start
Here's what Mark Fyffe said today in reply to notes I've
sent him (and others) regarding IBMLink 2000 outages:
From: Mark Fyffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Steve,
There is a great deal of focus on the problems. There have been some
short term steps taken with each problem that has arisen and there
PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: web IBMLINK down again -SEV1 32656350
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: web IBMLINK down again -SEV1 32656350
I think I will copy Mr. Fyffe and inquire if this means that all
On 31 Jul 2007 09:39:32 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Steve
How about if someone on the list who has a web site set up a standard e-mail
to send to the illustrious Mr. Palmisano. The e-mail could consist of the
eloquence we so often find in these posts regarding how vital a tool
Well first of all, I should probably point out that some of the more
useful features available on IBMLink are not free but part of a
chargeable service (Software Excel?). This I believe includes the
ability to search on and examine known issues (open as well as closed
APARs, as well as open
I can't get in now. I get an internal server error message.
Is it just me?
--
Mark Jacobs
Technical Services
Time Customer Service - Tampa, FL
--
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing.
If you can fake that, you've got it made.
-- Julius (Groucho) Henry Marx
/2007 02:57 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
IBMLINK Down again?
I can't get in now. I get an internal server error message.
Is it just me?
--
Mark Jacobs
Technical Services
Time Customer Service - Tampa, FL
no, I got the apologies page as well.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
He's dead Jim.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
meanwhile, 3270 interface STILL working like a champ!
Trick question: Now which one is it they should be getting rid of ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
In a message dated 3/30/2007 10:28:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trick question: Now which one is it they should be getting rid of ?
Seems like in a free market they would offer the customers $XX Weblink $YY
TN3270 $ZZ Both. Too radical for the current crop
3270 interface still working just fine,
meanwhile web ibmlink still down, master ticket # is: 31399941
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
03/30/2007 01:44 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: WEB IBMLINK down again
3270 interface still working just fine,
meanwhile web ibmlink still down, master ticket # is: 31399941
Client/Server = 20,000 chickens pulling a plow.
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
phone: 770-621-3256
fax: 770-621-3237
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.crawfordandcompany.com
This transmission is intended exclusively
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bruce Black
IBMLINK 2000 is down again. I reported it and they say that
the webmaster is working on it. You can't even get to the
signon screen right now
Perhaps it's time for IBM to consider rehosting IBMLink
I sure miss the green screen IBMLINK. Progress..
John Eatherly
IBMLINK 2000 is down again. I reported it and they say that the
webmaster is working on it. You can't even get to the signon screen
right now
--
For
---snip---
Client/Server = 20,000 chickens pulling a plow.
-unsnip---
Or 20,000 smelt towing a battleship! :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:08 AM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
---snip---
Client/Server = 20,000 chickens pulling a plow.
-unsnip---
Or 20,000 smelt towing a battleship! :-)
Or Herring as rose would have said.
Ed
44 matches
Mail list logo
