Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-17 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/11/2007 at 02:30 PM, willie bunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: We are having a difference of opinion with the following issue. A gener job is failing on an IEC145I 413-08. My interpretation is that the job failed because of an I/O error. The other opinion

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-12 Thread Mike Wood
are having a difference of opinion with the following issue. A gener job is failing on an IEC145I 413-08. My interpretation is that the job failed because of an I/O error. The other opinion is that because the tape is scratch (in RMM) and it does not permit the processing of a scratch tape

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-12 Thread willie bunter
is failing on an IEC145I 413-08. My interpretation is that the job failed because of an I/O error. The other opinion is that because the tape is scratch (in RMM) and it does not permit the processing of a scratch tape. Can we both be right? EDG4025I VOLUME J01932 REJECTED. READING OF SCRATCH

IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread willie bunter
We are having a difference of opinion with the following issue. A gener job is failing on an IEC145I 413-08. My interpretation is that the job failed because of an I/O error. The other opinion is that because the tape is scratch (in RMM) and it does not permit the processing of a scratch

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IEC145I 413-08 We are having a difference of opinion with the following issue. A gener job is failing

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread willie bunter
Subject: IEC145I 413-08 We are having a difference of opinion with the following issue. A gener job is failing on an IEC145I 413-08. My interpretation is that the job failed because of an I/O error. The other opinion is that because the tape is scratch (in RMM) and it does not permit the processing

Re: IEC145I 413-08 (and implications for SMP/E GIMDTS)

2007-04-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, willie bunter said: Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:30:01 -0700 We are having a difference of opinion with the following issue. A gener job is failing on an IEC145I 413-08. My interpretation is that the job failed because of an I/O error. The other opinion

Re: IEC145I 413-08 (and implications for SMP/E GIMDTS)

2007-04-11 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 5:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC145I 413-08 (and implications for SMP/E GIMDTS) In a recent note, willie bunter said: Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC145I 413-08 Can I force RMM to allow me to read the tape even though it is in scratch status? Pommier, Rex R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, you're kinda both right. It is failing due to an I/O error trying to read the input tape. The reason you're getting the I/O

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread Thompson, Steve
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC145I 413-08 Can I force RMM to allow me to read the tape even though it is in scratch status? snip

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 4/11/2007 4:30:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: REQUEST FAILED BY DFSMSrmm IEC145I 413-08,IFG0194K,O00130J,STEP01,SYSUT1,4611,,AMR4.PSEL$08.PFG98.Y2K.DRTES Well tell RMM it's a foreign tape then use last seventeen bytes as DSN and go to 2,NL

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Ed Finnell said: Subject: Re: IEC145I 413-08 In a message dated 4/11/2007 4:30:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: REQUEST FAILED BY DFSMSrmm IEC145I 413-08,IFG0194K,O00130J,STEP01,SYSUT1,4611,,AMR4.PSEL$08.PFG98.Y2K.DRTES Well tell RMM

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread willie bunter
I tried the bypass label (2,blp) but it still hammered me. Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a recent note, Ed Finnell said: Subject: Re: IEC145I 413-08 In a message dated 4/11/2007 4:30:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: REQUEST FAILED BY DFSMSrmm

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 4/11/2007 5:46:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I tried the bypass label (2,blp) but it still hammered me. CA-1 needs EXPDT=99365 to tell it to ignore tape management, don't know equivalent in RMM(thought it was honored there too?) Also for

Re: IEC145I 413-08

2007-04-11 Thread Gary Green
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 5:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IEC145I 413-08 Can I force RMM to allow me to read the tape even though it is in scratch status? Pommier, Rex R