Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G

2009-09-15 Thread Tommy Tsui
Hi all, Is there any big concern when added real memory from 5 to 7G, if all CSA, SQA, ECSA and ESQA remain unchanged? thanks and regards -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists

Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G

2009-09-16 Thread Hal Merritt
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G Hi all, Is there any big concern when added real memory from 5 to 7G, if all CSA, SQA, ECSA and ESQA remain unchanged? thanks and regards NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it

Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G

2009-09-16 Thread Thompson, Steve
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G Apples and oranges. The only

Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G

2009-09-16 Thread Scott Rowe
The Page Frame Table moved out of ESQA/ECSA in OS/390 2.10, so that shouldn't be an issue. I don't think there would be any change in HSA either. >>> "Thompson, Steve" 09/16/09 1:40 PM >>> I'd been thinking about this. Wouldn't the ESQA increase in size to track the increased number of page f

Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G

2009-09-17 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:38:38 -0400, Scott Rowe wrote: >The Page Frame Table moved out of ESQA/ECSA in OS/390 2.10 OS/390 2.10 + ARCHLVL=2 Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:mark.zel...@zurich

Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G

2009-09-17 Thread Scott Rowe
Was it just for ARCHLVL=2? I remember having to fix some code used in several of the Softworks products that had been mucking about in the PFT for years - all of a sudden it couldn't find the PFT anymore ;-) >>> Mark Zelden 9/17/2009 10:16 AM >>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:38:38 -0400, Scott Rowe

Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G

2009-09-17 Thread Mark Zelden
It was a 64-bit related change. Do I have a OS/390 2.10 system around to prove it? No. Can I point you to doc? No... but there is probably something in the archives. There should be another developer on the list that can confirm someone from IBM. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and System

Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G

2009-09-17 Thread Scott Rowe
It's no big deal, of course, but now that I think about it, you are probably right. I don't think we encountered the problem in our testing, because we didn't have a 64-bit machine yet, so one of our ESP customers ran into it first. It was a pretty easy fix - as soon as I looked at the code I

Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G

2009-09-17 Thread Jim Mulder
Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G > > Mark Zelden > > to: > > IBM-MAIN > > 09/17/2009 02:15 PM > > Sent by: > > IBM Mainframe Discussion List > > Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List > > It was a 64-bit r