Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-23 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro [ snip ] No magic involved. The 'stump' is passed control with appropriate R1 and R13 addresses once CICS determines it is command level. Not trying to teach Granny to suck eggs but as previously

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-23 Thread Capomaestro
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:47:33 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro [ snip ] No magic involved. The 'stump' is passed control with appropriate R1 and R13 addresses once CICS determines it is

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-22 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro [ snip ] -- -- --- |CICS| -- |MYASMBLR| |R1 -- ???|...|R13 - ???| -- -- --- -- --

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-22 Thread Capomaestro
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:50:44 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro [ snip ] -- -- --- |CICS| -- |MYASMBLR| |R1 -- ???|...|R13 - ???| --

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-17 Thread Capomaestro
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro Had the recent opportunity to code some dual-mode (CICS batch) assembler. After searching the LISTSERVs the DFHAFCD macro (hlq.SDFHMACS) revealed itself. The code did not contained CICS EXEC statements

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-17 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro [ snip ] If CICS (KCP, which would make the assembler code main, right?) detects that a module is not command level then R1 does not point at a parameter list (DFHCOMMAREA) neither does R13 point

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-17 Thread Capomaestro
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:40:58 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro [ snip ] If CICS (KCP, which would make the assembler code main, right?) detects that a module is not command level then R1 does

Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-16 Thread Capomaestro
Had the recent opportunity to code some dual-mode (CICS batch) assembler. After searching the LISTSERVs the DFHAFCD macro (hlq.SDFHMACS) revealed itself. The code did not contained CICS EXEC statements and therefore did not require preprocessing. Upon entry under CICS the registers point into

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-16 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro Had the recent opportunity to code some dual-mode (CICS batch) assembler. After searching the LISTSERVs the DFHAFCD macro (hlq.SDFHMACS) revealed itself. The code did not contained CICS EXEC

Re: Is this CICS (or are we having fun yet?)

2005-08-16 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Capomaestro Au contraire, the DFHEAI stub is *required* to be the first CSECT in the module. CICS 'interrogates' modules for it's I-catcher to determine if it is command level or not. Sorry; I thought you said