In
a826b9fd78356242a9d9595912f9b2322cdc6f2...@doittmail03.doitt.nycnet,
on 10/08/2010
at 10:39 AM, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov said:
I do not know the DDNAME that TSO CALL uses for the pgmlib
allocation,
Generated and returned by DYNALLOC.
***routine LOCDEBS locates the DEB for all
...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Name of a program's library
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:18:41 -0500 Etienne Thijsse e.thij...@chello.nl wrote:
:Thanks, Eileen, for showing me the way. I have been able
Thanks, Eileen, for showing me the way. I have been able to create a C
program that calls a few assembler modules to do the BLDL call to get the
STEPLIB concatenation nr, and then the RDJFCB call to get the dataset name.
It was a bit complicated because the C program is 31 bit and RDJFCB must
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:18:41 -0500 Etienne Thijsse e.thij...@chello.nl wrote:
:Thanks, Eileen, for showing me the way. I have been able to create a C
:program that calls a few assembler modules to do the BLDL call to get the
:STEPLIB concatenation nr, and then the RDJFCB call to get the dataset
In listserv%201009290414264560.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 09/29/2010
at 04:14 AM, Etienne Thijsse e.thij...@chello.nl said:
Is there a way for a C program (LE) to find out what library (PDSE)
it is in?
I don't know of a way to do so without resorting to assembler.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
I wonder if it would be possible to enhance FETCH or the LLE(?)
to contain the actual DSN/VOLSER of the dataset used. That would
only require 44+6 extra bytes of memory. Which I don't think
is a big deal in today's environment.
Possible, sure? Gonna happen? Not too likely.
The control block
snip-
I wonder if it would be possible to enhance FETCH or the LLE(?)
to contain the actual DSN/VOLSER of the dataset used. That would
only require 44+6 extra bytes of memory. Which I don't think
is a big deal in today's
In general, it is not possible.
For many cases, the approach of mimicking the system's search order and
doing BLDL's with RDJFCB will help.
Here are some (not all) cases that don't work
-- module was located via some DCB associated with an opened DD that is no
longer open
-- module was in MLPA
: Re: Name of a program's library
In general, it is not possible.
For many cases, the approach of mimicking the system's search order and
doing BLDL's with RDJFCB will help.
Here are some (not all) cases that don't work
-- module was located via some DCB associated with an opened DD
, John
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 6:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Name of a program's library
Just doing blue skying here, but I wonder if it would be possible to enhance
FETCH or the LLE(?) to contain the actual DSN/VOLSER of the dataset used. That
would only require 44+6
Responding to the last note in this thread,
original message
Just doing blue skying here, but I wonder if it would be possible to enhance
FETCH or the LLE(?) to contain the actual DSN/VOLSER of the dataset used.
That would only require 44+6 extra bytes of memory. Which I don't think is a
big
Every time this topic comes up (and it does fairly often), I
again remind people of the existing SHARE requirement:
SSLNGC0313587 New LE Callable Service to get (various) Program Names
A new LE callable service (with capabilities well beyond
CEE3GRN) should be
created to obtain
This topic is a recurrent one.
Bill Fairchild is only the most recent poster to make it clear clear 1) that
this question does not always have an answer and 2) that when it does have an
answer that answer may be ambiguous, obsolete/non-current, or wrong.
It is important that these
On 30 September 2010 07:52, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
Just doing blue skying here, but I wonder if it would be possible to enhance
FETCH or the LLE(?) to contain the actual DSN/VOLSER of the dataset used.
That would only require 44+6 extra bytes of memory.
UNIX
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:52:22 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
Just doing blue skying here, but I wonder if it would be possible
to enhance FETCH or the LLE(?) to contain the actual DSN/VOLSER
of the dataset used.
I suppose that might be possible if the data set was loaded from LNKLST.
It would be
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Name of a program's library
On 30 September 2010 07:52, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
Just doing blue skying here, but I wonder if it would be possible to enhance
FETCH or the LLE(?) to contain the actual DSN/VOLSER of the dataset used
Subject: Re: Name of a program's library
Just doing blue skying here, but I wonder if it would be possible to enhance
FETCH or the LLE(?) to contain the actual DSN/VOLSER of the dataset used.
That would only require 44+6 extra bytes of memory. Which I don't think is a
big deal in today's
Hi,
Is there a way for a C program (LE) to find out what library (PDSE) it is in?
I expected this information in argv[0], but that only contains the member
name, not the PDSE itself.
Is there an LE function for this? Or can it be found in some control block?
Thanks,
Etienne
2:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Name of a program's library
Hi,
Is there a way for a C program (LE) to find out what library (PDSE) it is
in?
I expected this information in argv[0], but that only contains the member
name, not the PDSE itself.
Is there an LE function for this? Or can
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Name of a program's library
Hi,
Is there a way for a C program (LE) to find out what library (PDSE) it is
in?
I expected this information in argv[0], but that only contains the member
name, not the PDSE itself.
Is there an LE function for this? Or can it be found
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Name of a program's library
Hi,
Is there a way for a C program (LE) to find out what library (PDSE) it is
in?
I expected this information in argv[0], but that only contains the member
name, not the PDSE itself.
Is there an LE function for this? Or can it be found
the JFCBDSNM (dsname) can be obtained.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Etienne Thijsse
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 9:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Name of a program's library
Thanks Charles,
The thread does
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Etienne Thijsse
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Name of a program's library
Thanks
),MF=L
DROP LINKREG
LTORG
EJECT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Etienne Thijsse
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Name of a program's library
24 matches
Mail list logo
