Phil Payne has some interesting comments on the new mainframes being
announced tomorrow by IBM. You can read them on his web site at:
http://www.isham-research.co.uk/mainframe_2008.html
http://www.isham-research.co.uk/mips_z9.html
The disclaimer on the 2nd link is kind of humorous.
Now the
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/20/ibm_mainframe_refresh/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://b
Please queue up behind me :-) There is already a line.
Birger Heede
IBM Software Group
Tom Grieve wrote:
"Ed Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/20/ibm_mainframe_refresh/
z/OS 7.1? I can't wait!
Tom Grieve
CICS Developme
"John Eells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Tom Grieve wrote:
> > "Ed Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/20/ibm_mainframe_refresh/
> >>
> >
> > z/OS 7.1? I can't wait!
> >
> > Tom
In a message dated 7/21/2005 7:10:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IBM's algorithmes of numbering products have always been a mistery, so we
will not be surprised by whatever the name will be of z/OS 1.7's successor,
maybe 7.1 -;).
Let's hope they get rid of the le
Why wouldn't it arrive powered on? ('POR' should be retired)
Birger Heede
IBM Software Group
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
"John Eells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Tom Grieve wrote:
"Ed Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
> In a message dated 7/21/2005 7:10:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> IBM's algorithmes of numbering products have always been a mistery, so we
> will not be surprised by whatever the name will be
Yeah right,
OK, one last POR to enter the PORless era.
Remember how often we were promised that this was the "last JES upgrade that
needed a cold start"?
Kees.
"Birger Heede" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Why wouldn't it arrive powered on? ('POR' should be ret
Well we all know that it won't be a HAL 9000
Ed
On Jul 21, 2005, at 7:52 AM, Birger Heede wrote:
Why wouldn't it arrive powered on? ('POR' should be retired)
Birger Heede
IBM Software Group
-SNIP-
-
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:43:22 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yeah right,
>OK, one last POR to enter the PORless era.
>Remember how often we were promised that this was the "last JES upgrade
that
>needed a cold start"?
>
And that promise has been kept (as long as you staye
"Mark Zelden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:43:22 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Yeah right,
> >OK, one last POR to enter the PORless era.
> >Remember how often we were promised that this was the "last JES
11 matches
Mail list logo