Hi all
Have a possibility the user of USS-OMVS submit job to MVS as batch with
change in member of SYS1.PARMLIB BPXPRMxx or in other member ?? In the
example below of display SDSF the user run a process as STC, but I need
modify for batch. The system are OS/390 2.10 compatibility mode.
JOBNAME
s but the preferred method of authorizing
access is via the security system.
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Arueira Campos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 6:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: OMVS SERVICES submit as batch
Hi all
Have a possibility the user of USS
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Arueira Campos
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:29 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: OMVS SERVICES submit as batch
>
>
> Hi all
>
> Have a
I understood that he's asked to avoid the "STC" for forked()
/ spawned() UNIX processes. If this is the question, then the
answer is there is no way.
forked() / spawned() UNIX processe run in BPXAS address spaces
and these are STCs started by WLM. This similar to the JES
initiators which are sta
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUB 34)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:57 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: OMVS SERVICES submit as batch
>
>
> I understood t
>As an aside, it is quite normal in the UNIX world to start "long
>running" work similar to the following:
>
>nohup unix-command ..params.. standard.output.messages
>2>error.messages &
>
>I've not tried this on z/OS to see if it works. And on most current
UNIX
>systems, the user is sitting on a X s
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
06/27/2006
at 10:29 AM, Jorge Arueira Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Have a possibility the user of USS-OMVS submit job to MVS as batch
>with change in member of SYS1.PARMLIB BPXPRMxx or in other member
>??
I have no idea which of several unrelated questions you'
7 matches
Mail list logo
