Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-27 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/21/2007 at 01:13 PM, "Barkow, Eileen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Was not the basis of VM/CMS to allow each user their own >self-contained operating system? Even in the CP/67 days there were facilities for cooperation among virtual machines. There was a time when I

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-22 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Staller, Allan > > LOL, > > To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each > application would have it's own OS!!!! > > > > > Subject: Off Topi

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
McKown, John wrote: And its own customized mathematics subroutine library. Gee, didn't we have this with the 1401? I seem to recall the mathematical subroutine library on the 1401 a little wanting Gerhard Postpischil Bradford, VT new e-mail address: gerhardp (at) charter (dot) net -

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Howard Brazee
On 21 Jun 2007 10:13:22 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >Was not the basis of VM/CMS to allow each user their own self-contained >operating system? VM also gives other advantages which could be useful to be copied here.

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Rick Fochtman
--- Was not the basis of VM/CMS to allow each user their own self-contained operating system? - Yes and no. You could change parameters (sometimes) but the code was all contained in a shared segment of virtual stora

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Barkow, Eileen
Concept should be Known To All On 21 Jun 2007 09:11:31 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >>To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application >>would have it's own OS >> > > >It would be better to say that each applicatio

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Howard Brazee
On 21 Jun 2007 09:11:31 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >>To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application >>would have it's own OS >> > > >It would be better to say that each application would have to include much >of the operating suystem function within it. >T

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Mike Hill - Saffron Services
Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All LOL, To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application would have it's own OS!!!! Subject: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All http://www.theregister.com/2007

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Kirk Talman
Amen! from my quote file: a statement not only false in itself, but one which casts doubt on all previous utterances from the same source. - H.P. Herbert q.Peter Hebblethwaite _NCR_92May8p14 IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/21/2007 09:17:44 AM: > RIGHT! > And then every appli

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Brick) writes: > http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/20/usenix_07_opening_keynote/ the new, 40yr old theme, curtesy of the science center http://www.garlic.com/~lynn

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Howard Brazee
On 21 Jun 2007 05:18:37 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Staller, Allan) wrote: >LOL, > >To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application >would have it's own OS We have been redefining OS, application, and programming language and will continue to do so. Java is a type of virtu

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Bill Wilkie
John: If you set your word marks properly, you did. Bill From: "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:17:44 -0500 > --

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 7:18 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All > > > LOL, >

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 6/21/2007 7:18:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application would have it's own OS >> Isn't that how google works? ** See what's free at http://ww

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Shane
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 07:18 -0500, Staller, Allan wrote: > LOL, > > To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application > would have it's own OS M - must be that time of year again for a(nother) microkernel vs. monolithic flame-fest. Shane ... -

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Richbourg, Claude
8:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All LOL, To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application would have it's own OS Subject: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All http://www.theregister

Re: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Staller, Allan
LOL, To carry this argument to it's logical conclusion, each application would have it's own OS Subject: Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/20/usenix_07_openi

Off Topic But Concept should be Known To All

2007-06-21 Thread Ken Brick
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/20/usenix_07_opening_keynote/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://