Re: Outlook Reply behaviour (Example: RE: SV: SV: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal)

2009-11-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In d173ec266418d84395b4b89759d861d403cf9...@usmdlmdowx025.dow.com, on 11/02/2009 at 05:21 PM, van der Grijn, Bart (B) bvandergr...@dow.com said: As far as I'm concerned everyone has the right to use whatever reply prefix they want There is an Internet convention to use re: in replies,

Outlook Reply behaviour (Example: RE: SV: SV: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal)

2009-11-02 Thread van der Grijn, Bart (B)
My apologies if this has been discussed in the past, but as someone that groups his IBM-Main inbox by Subject I want to point out the following: http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/06/re-outlook/ As far as I'm concerned everyone has the right to use whatever reply prefix they want and I don't