W dniu 2011-04-26 22:37, john gilmore pisze:
The traditional limitation to 2^16-1 = 65535 tracks is one more instance of
control-block overflow, here that of in an unsigned halfword field.
PDS support is 'functionally stabilized', i.e., frozen. For this and other
reasons it is thus---with
This is not a direct answer, more I guess a question.
wasn#39;t there an IBM announcement that at some time in the near future IBM
would support a pds like dataset that supports multi-volume ? my vague
recollection that it was ZFS type data set.
Ed
Hi,
Is it possible to allocate a single PDS dataset in Multi-volume ? Can anyone
please direct me
Regards,
Jags
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
Is it possible to
From:jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com
Is it possible to allocate a single PDS dataset in Multi-volume ?
No. See http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/dgt2d480.pdf,
Processing a Partitioned Data Set, for more details.
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
Jags
Thanks to Walter Marguccio for the general reference.
Here's an URL you can use which avoids having to download a whole manual:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2D490/3.7.3
quote
3.7.3 Allocating Space for a PDS
...
A PDS cannot occupy more than 65 535
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: PDS multi-volume
Hi,
Is it possible to allocate a single PDS dataset in Multi-volume ? Can anyone
please direct me
Regards,
Jags
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 4:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PDS multi-volume
Neither PDS nor PDSE can be multi-volume.
-
Ted MacNEIL
Very true. However
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:11:50 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Neither PDS nor PDSE can be multi-volume.
Very true. However, I wonder how acceptable it might be to use BPAM's PDS
emulation to store what would
W dniu 2011-04-26 18:18, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:11:50 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Neither PDS nor PDSE can be multi-volume.
Very true. However, I wonder how acceptable it might be to use
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:04:13 +0200, R.S. wrote:
Well... Probably I did not understand all the discussion above, but IMHO
there are no size limitations for PDS *or* PDSE. That means, both
flavors of dataset-with-members-inside can be single volume only, but
PDSE is limited only by the size of the
The traditional limitation to 2^16-1 = 65535 tracks is one more instance of
control-block overflow, here that of in an unsigned halfword field.
PDS support is 'functionally stabilized', i.e., frozen. For this and other
reasons it is thus---with the well-known exceptions of system data sets
BTW: I strongly believe there are MRs (customer Marekting Request)
submitted to IBM to make PDS(E) multi-volume. I would like to know
justification to refuse to such request.
I would guess directory complexity.
And, performance.
PKZIP solved it by putting the directory on the last disk.
But,
--snip-
The traditional limitation to 2^16-1 = 65535 tracks is one more instance of control-block overflow, here that of in an unsigned halfword field.
PDS support is 'functionally stabilized', i.e., frozen. For this and other
On 4/26/2011 4:12 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
--snip-
The traditional limitation to 2^16-1 = 65535 tracks is one more instance of
control-block overflow, here that of in an unsigned halfword field.
PDS support is 'functionally
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:22:44 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Not to mention the vast numbr of OEM programs that would be broken by a
change in the format of the answer from a NOTE request.
IBM extended the size of the information returned by NOTE some time ago from
three-byte TTRs to four-byte
15 matches
Mail list logo
