On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:50:21 -0500, Don Imbriale wrote:
I agree that the RLSE is unneeded and should be corrected. But my
suggestion may help until the fix is in.
I suppose you were trying to be helpful. Thanks for that.
But I get weary of being told, when I report that X doesn't work,
that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 10:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PK64372 (was: SMS NONSMS difference)
SNIPPAGE
And I'm dismayed that IBM deems my report
In the SPACE parameter, reverse the primary and secondary quantities.
--
--
Don Imbriale
temporarily retired
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:32:40 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
If you would mail to me
Sent privately;
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:14:05 -0500, Don Imbriale wrote:
In the SPACE parameter, reverse the primary and secondary quantities.
Irrelevant. Please don't claim that the existence of even an obvious
alternative refutes the observation of the original problem. It
might demote it from a SEV2 to a
I agree that the RLSE is unneeded and should be corrected. But my
suggestion may help until the fix is in.
--
--
Don Imbriale
temporarily retired
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.comwrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:14:05 -0500, Don Imbriale wrote:
In the
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:25:46 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
We are writing from a multthread C/C++ application to a dataset
,allocated with (RECFM=F,LRECL=133,BUFNO=1).
If it is non SMS managed we got all the outputs from the different
threads, but if SMS managed the last close overwrite the
Hi
If you would mail to me
miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
Thank you.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:25:46 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
We are writing from a multthread C/C++ application to a dataset
,allocated with (RECFM=F,LRECL=133,BUFNO=1).
If it is non SMS
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:32:40 +0100, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
If you would mail to me
Sent privately; 47KiB.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
This feels vaguely similar to PK64372. The APAR is peculiarly
uninformative, but IBM might share more with you. The associated
PMR is Record 79232,033,000. I
8 matches
Mail list logo
