In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/18/2006
at 07:01 PM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Considering you can only get 59 volumes on a multi-volume dataset 64
>doesn't make sense.
It makes perfect sense if you know anything about JES2. You're making
an unwarranted assumption about JES2; SYS1.H
cc
Discussion List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.EDU> Re: RES: J
>But if it opens each volume as a separate dataset, then the 59 volume limit
>does not apply
Unlike others, I'm willing to admit when I err.
But, ISTR, we had a major problem because of the 59 volume limit, years ago.
If I'm wrong, I'm wrong.
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
---
the MAS.
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RES: JES2 SPOOLDEF
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 2:01 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: RES: JES2 SPOOLDEF
>
>
> >SPOOLNUM=64
>
> Considering yo
>SPOOLNUM=64
Considering you can only get 59 volumes on a multi-volume dataset 64 doesn't
make sense.
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome
de Terry Bruns
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 18 de agosto de 2006 14:45
Para: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Assunto: JES2 SPOOLDEF
They currently have 4 3390-3s being used for spool space, with three
more
volumes available for adding if need
7 matches
Mail list logo
