Re: TCP/IP anomality

2005-07-02 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
Itschak Mugzach wrote: Good Morning, Our MF is equipped with two OSA cards. The following devices are defined: Vipa, card1 and card2. The Beginroutes statement defines some static routes, all of them, except one, uses card2. The default route is also pointing to card2. There is one route statem

Re: TCP/IP anomality

2005-06-30 Thread Hal Merritt
On Behalf Of Craig Kittendorf Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 9:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: TCP/IP anomality I may not answer your question, but I can show you what we have with three OSA-2 cards: HOME xxx.yyy.225.131 VIPA1 xxx.yyy.225.2 OSA4 xxx.yyy.225.3 OSA5 xxx.yyy.22

Re: TCP/IP anomality

2005-06-30 Thread Hal Merritt
Something to consider that inbound and outbound traffic are two completely different things. There is no concept of a 'session'. Here is my understanding: VIPA only sets an address for inbound traffic. As a logical entity, it is not tied to any physical device. Packets addressed to the VIPA IP

Re: TCP/IP anomality

2005-06-30 Thread Craig Kittendorf
I may not answer your question, but I can show you what we have with three OSA-2 cards: HOME xxx.yyy.225.131 VIPA1 xxx.yyy.225.2 OSA4 xxx.yyy.225.3 OSA5 xxx.yyy.225.4 OSA6 BEGINRoutes ROUTE xxx.yyy.225.0 255.255.255.0 = OSA4 MTU 1500 ROUTE xxx.yyy.225.0 255.255.255.0 = OSA5 M