In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/24/2006
at 01:42 AM, Steve Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As Gilmartin says, it's trivially easy to define the DSN naming
conventions as an RE,
Restricting the length to 44 is the hard part.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position;
On 26/02/06, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/24/2006
at 01:42 AM, Steve Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As Gilmartin says, it's trivially easy to define the DSN naming
conventions as an RE,
Restricting the length to 44 is the hard part.
I do
Listers,
--
Steve
Despair - It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
I'll try again, without hitting SEND immediately!
I was after a regular expression to define a valid MVS dataset name.
Does anyone have something to hand? I can't find anything in the
archives...
--
Steve
Despair - It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:12:44 + Steve Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I was after a regular expression to define a valid MVS dataset name.
:Does anyone have something to hand? I can't find anything in the
:archives...
Don't know RE's but.
Maximum length 44
Structure is FOO followed
22920FAX: 540-456-6658
At 2/23/2006 08:56 AM, BDissen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:12:44 SFlynn wrote:
I was after a regular expression to define a valid MVS dataset
name. Does anyone have something to hand? I can't find anything in
the archives...
Don't know RE's
On 23/02/06, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:12:44 + Steve Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I was after a regular expression to define a valid MVS dataset name.
:Does anyone have something to hand? I can't find anything in the
:archives...
Don't know RE's
On 23/02/06, David Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, a dash (aka hyphen, minus sign) can be used anywhere a
digit can (i.e. 2nd through 8th character within any qualifier).
Bugger. Forgot about that too!
--
Steve
Despair - It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black...
In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said:
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:56:49 +0200
Can this be described as an RE?
Since the language is finite, it's trivially possible
to describe it as an RE. A better question is whether
it's practical.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
Remember also that single level dataset names are possible (depending on
settings in your RACF-U-like product)
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
In a recent note, Steve Flynn said:
FOO = [EMAIL PROTECTED]@$]{1,8}?\.
Are minuscule alphabetics allowed in data set names?
And it depends on whether your site has disabled ICF
catalog DSN validity checking, discussed here recently.
And it depends on what language or interface to the OS
On 23/02/06, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a recent note, Steve Flynn said:
FOO = [EMAIL PROTECTED]@$]{1,8}?\.
Are minuscule alphabetics allowed in data set names?
They are in my specific case.
And it depends on whether your site has disabled ICF
catalog DSN validity
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:30:10 +, Steve Flynn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking as somene who is learning RegExp's as he goes along I think;
FOO = [EMAIL PROTECTED]@$]{1,8}?\.
At this point I think I've covered the first qualifier... An ungodly
mess if I ever saw one. Hope slips from my
FOO = [EMAIL PROTECTED]@$]{1,8}?\.
Actually, the above is incorrect.
A.
Is a valid dataset name under the above RE.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
On 23/02/06, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FOO = [EMAIL PROTECTED]@$]{1,8}?\.
Actually, the above is incorrect.
A.
Is a valid dataset name under the above RE.
It's completely incorrect. I have further refined it, but my latest
effort is still not up to scratch.
As Gilmartin says,
15 matches
Mail list logo
