<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.EDU> Re: SMF in System Logger
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:20:02 -0700, Skip Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Structure size is a crap shoot. I get rather
>frequent XCF warnings that the structure is above the high water mark of
>80% recommended by IBM, but the system catches up within seconds.
See past rants ... er ..posts on
On 04/14/2008 01:20 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
> I presented a user session at SHARE Orlando based on experience with our
> z/OS 1.9 sandbox image. In the meantime, we have migrated SMF Logger to
our
> development system, which gets very busy and therefore creates way more
SMF
> data than the sand
cc
Discussion List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.EDU>
"Jim Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com>...
> We are beginning to test SMF in logstreams and so far, so good. Like
> others have mentioned, I really, really want the ability
> to delete records from the logstream programmatically after I've
extracted
> th
We are beginning to test SMF in logstreams and so far, so good. Like
others have mentioned, I really, really want the ability
to delete records from the logstream programmatically after I've extracted
them, but I can wait. Based on our experiences with
VSAM SMF recording over the years we've d
6 matches
Mail list logo