This is was in the smfprm
SUBSYS(SLSP,INTERVAL(003000),TYPE(255))
SUBPARM(SLSP(SUBTYPE(1,2,3,4,5,6,8)))
I've looked around and i can't find what type(255) means ?
Can anyone please tell me?
Thanks in advanced!
--
Cumprimentos,
Luís Correia
This says for subsystem SLSP ( which I guess is the STK subsystem to run
the tape SILO, we
call ours SLS0) cut an SMF record every 30 minutes.
In the SLSP setup ypu define what SMF record number to use (in this case
the STK default
if I remember right) 255.
IBM reseres SMF record numbers 1
I've looked around and i can't find what type(255) means ?
Can anyone please tell me?
Any record type above 127 is a 'user' record.
IE: from an ISV, usually.
While there are conventions, there are no true controls.
The trick is to find out what the sub-system SLSP is, and go look up its
product
Thanks!
I will look for it...
On 3/15/06, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've looked around and i can't find what type(255) means ?
Can anyone please tell me?
Any record type above 127 is a 'user' record.
IE: from an ISV, usually.
While there are conventions, there are no true
Thanks!
On 3/15/06, Alan C. Field [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This says for subsystem SLSP ( which I guess is the STK subsystem to run
the tape SILO, we
call ours SLS0) cut an SMF record every 30 minutes.
In the SLSP setup ypu define what SMF record number to use (in this case
the STK default
Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program.
Jon
snip
The trick is to find out what the sub-system SLSP is, and go look up its
product documentation.
While SLSP looks familiar, I cannot recall what product it is.
/snip
Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program.
We called our sub-system SILO.
But, it's been a few years since we had one.
ISTR, that 255 was the record used.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 16:00, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program.
We called our sub-system SILO.
But, it's been a few years since we had one.
ISTR, that 255 was the record used.
teD's messages always show up in my inbox as Yesterday 16:00:00.
of the
little peculiarities that can lighten a dull existence.
All of which means to say you are not alone.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: Richard Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, 15 March, 2006 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: SMF type
]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, 15 March, 2006 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: SMF type(255)
Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program.
We called our sub-system SILO.
But, it's been a few years since we had one.
ISTR, that 255 was the record used
teD's messages always show up in my inbox as Yesterday 16:00:00.
Everyone else shows up in correct date/time sequence.
Is it just me, or do others see that also.
Richard Pace
This comes up every now and then.
The RIM Canadian BlackBerry Server has a bug in it.
If my message passes through more
A little while ago Ted himself noted this effect - or had been told about
it - an attempted to fix it - it being due I think to a mail server he
himself runs.
I have not had good success with the Canadian RIM server (Research In Motion).
With my first BlackBerry (after I separated from my wife
12 matches
Mail list logo