SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Luis Correia
This is was in the smfprm SUBSYS(SLSP,INTERVAL(003000),TYPE(255)) SUBPARM(SLSP(SUBTYPE(1,2,3,4,5,6,8))) I've looked around and i can't find what type(255) means ? Can anyone please tell me? Thanks in advanced! -- Cumprimentos, Luís Correia

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Alan C. Field
This says for subsystem SLSP ( which I guess is the STK subsystem to run the tape SILO, we call ours SLS0) cut an SMF record every 30 minutes. In the SLSP setup ypu define what SMF record number to use (in this case the STK default if I remember right) 255. IBM reseres SMF record numbers 1

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Ted MacNEIL
I've looked around and i can't find what type(255) means ? Can anyone please tell me? Any record type above 127 is a 'user' record. IE: from an ISV, usually. While there are conventions, there are no true controls. The trick is to find out what the sub-system SLSP is, and go look up its product

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Luis Correia
Thanks! I will look for it... On 3/15/06, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've looked around and i can't find what type(255) means ? Can anyone please tell me? Any record type above 127 is a 'user' record. IE: from an ISV, usually. While there are conventions, there are no true

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Luis Correia
Thanks! On 3/15/06, Alan C. Field [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This says for subsystem SLSP ( which I guess is the STK subsystem to run the tape SILO, we call ours SLS0) cut an SMF record every 30 minutes. In the SLSP setup ypu define what SMF record number to use (in this case the STK default

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Jon Brock
Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program. Jon snip The trick is to find out what the sub-system SLSP is, and go look up its product documentation. While SLSP looks familiar, I cannot recall what product it is. /snip

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program. We called our sub-system SILO. But, it's been a few years since we had one. ISTR, that 255 was the record used. - -teD I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Richard Pace
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 16:00, Ted MacNEIL wrote: Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program. We called our sub-system SILO. But, it's been a few years since we had one. ISTR, that 255 was the record used. teD's messages always show up in my inbox as Yesterday 16:00:00.

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Chris Mason
of the little peculiarities that can lighten a dull existence. All of which means to say you are not alone. Chris Mason - Original Message - From: Richard Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, 15 March, 2006 10:41 PM Subject: Re: SMF type

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Chris Mason
] Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, 15 March, 2006 1:00 AM Subject: Re: SMF type(255) Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program. We called our sub-system SILO. But, it's been a few years since we had one. ISTR, that 255 was the record used

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Ted MacNEIL
teD's messages always show up in my inbox as Yesterday 16:00:00. Everyone else shows up in correct date/time sequence. Is it just me, or do others see that also. Richard Pace This comes up every now and then. The RIM Canadian BlackBerry Server has a bug in it. If my message passes through more

Re: SMF type(255)

2006-03-15 Thread Ted MacNEIL
A little while ago Ted himself noted this effect - or had been told about it - an attempted to fix it - it being due I think to a mail server he himself runs. I have not had good success with the Canadian RIM server (Research In Motion). With my first BlackBerry (after I separated from my wife