SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Thomas Berg
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Vernooij, CP - SPLXM Skickat: den 25 januari 2012 12:24 Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Ämne: Re: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE I see what you mean. What are 'dynamic steplib functions from

SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Thomas Berg
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Don Poitras Skickat: den 25 januari 2012 13:11 Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Ämne: Re: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE In article

SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Thomas Berg
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Elardus Engelbrecht Skickat: den 25 januari 2012 13:17 Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Ämne: Re: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE Thomas Berg wrote: There are cases when putting steplib(s) in

SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Thomas Berg
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Barbara Nitz Skickat: den 25 januari 2012 13:11 Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Ämne: Re: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE Our TSO users select the 'environment' they like to work in, i.e.

SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Thomas Berg
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Skickat: den 25 januari 2012 14:22 Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Ämne: Re: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE In

Re: SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Thomas Berg wrote: In fact, we usually do *not* have //STEPLIB in our logon procs. (Partly of performance reasons.) Good that you can avoid them. I agree about performance reasons, why allocate something if you don't use it at all in your session? Please tell me more about this dynamic

Re: SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Don Poitras
Thomas Berg wrote: -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Don Poitras Skickat: den 25 januari 2012 13:11 Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Ämne: Re: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE In article

Re: SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Juergen Keller
Thomas, STEPLIB from CBTTAPE works, I've tested it but its not supported/recommended. There was a discussion about DYNAMIC STEPLIB last year and Jim Mulder wrote: The only supported mechanism in MVS for adding to the module library search order within as address space is an ATTACH with a

SV: SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Thomas Berg
januari 2012 16:00 Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Ämne: Re: SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE Thomas, STEPLIB from CBTTAPE works, I've tested it but its not supported/recommended. There was a discussion about DYNAMIC STEPLIB last year and Jim Mulder wrote: The only supported mechanism in MVS

Re: SV: STEPLIB problems - was: PDSE

2012-01-25 Thread Pinnacle
On 1/25/2012 10:12 AM, Juergen Keller wrote: Thomas, STEPLIB from CBTTAPE works, I've tested it but its not supported/recommended. There was a discussion about DYNAMIC STEPLIB last year and Jim Mulder wrote: The only supported mechanism in MVS for adding to the module library search order