> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Paul
> Gilmartin
> Skickat: den 13 februari 2012 16:30
> Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Ämne: Re: SV: Archaic allocation in JCL (Was: Physical record size query)
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:13:
"Thomas Berg" wrote in message
news:...
> > -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För R.S.
> > Skickat: den 13 februari 2012 15:49
> > Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> > Ämne: Re: SV: SV:
On 02/13/12 10:20, Thomas Berg wrote:
I refuse! :)
(In my life space abends occurs regularly, often caused by circumstances beyond
my control.)
BTW, You latter suggestions is not bad - but You didn't go far enough! There
should unlimited number of *everything*! Don't make artificial limits
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För R.S.
> Skickat: den 13 februari 2012 15:49
> Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Archaic allocation in JCL (Was: Physical record size
> query)
>
> W dniu
W dniu 2012-02-13 15:21, Thomas Berg pisze:
(This is an answer also to Vernooij.)
Please consider what You do manually when the space is to small (e g B37 etc.),
or You just is unsure: You try a bigger allocation, maybe also extend (or
reduce) the secondary amount. And repeat. Often many times
(This is an answer also to Vernooij.)
Please consider what You do manually when the space is to small (e g B37 etc.),
or You just is unsure: You try a bigger allocation, maybe also extend (or
reduce) the secondary amount. And repeat. Often many times.
Would it be a problem if this (more or less
6 matches
Mail list logo
