In
cakxahqw_nnqu8pqfsy+fqowj0jtqhistds+pbw20sryo3he...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/30/2011
at 01:20 PM, Chris Craddock crashlu...@gmail.com said:
Additional *SOFTWARE* architectural conditions may have to be
satisfied in order for the instruction to complete,
ITYM that additional software
I have noted a couple of omissions in the PoPs that I will submit
a Readers Comment for
I didn't notice that any of the things you mentioned regarding the PoOp
are necessarily omissions or things to be corrected (but I might have
missed it). You questioned the list of semiprivileged
On 12/30/2011 5:52 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
I have noted a couple of omissions in the PoPs that I will submit
a Readers Comment for
I didn't notice that any of the things you mentioned regarding the PoOp
are necessarily omissions or things to be corrected (but I might have
missed it). You
Steve, Peter is (of course) right. You're struggling with cases where most
people generally miss the distinction between the hardware architecture and
the software architecture implemented by any given control program. The
hardware knows nothing at all about what you would think of as
In 4efdc456.2050...@trainersfriend.com, on 12/30/2011
at 07:01 AM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com said:
the consistency is not what I, personally, would like.
I don't see the inconsistency in what you mentioned. I agree that the
definitions should precede the use, or, at the least, a
5 matches
Mail list logo
