Re: Syslog missing (now: SCRT)

2012-05-16 Thread Hal Merritt
@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Syslog missing (now: SCRT) W dniu 2012-05-16 13:42, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze: > [1] - You just can't go on a C ALL '= ' '=*NONE' spree without breaking > somet

Re: Syslog missing (now: SCRT)

2012-05-16 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
R Skorupka wrote: >> [1] - You just can't go on a C ALL '= ' '=*NONE' spree without breaking >> something ... >But you can split the job stream. I moved DD * content to separate members and >DO NOT change them. Also the JCL itself is (almost) not changed. The only >change is to replace object

Re: Syslog missing (now: SCRT)

2012-05-16 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2012-05-16 13:42, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze: [1] - You just can't go on a C ALL '= ' '=*NONE' spree without breaking something ... But you can split the job stream. I moved DD * content to separate members and DO NOT change them. Also the JCL itself is (almost) not changed. The only

Re: Syslog missing (now: SCRT)

2012-05-16 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
R Skorupka wrote: >SCRT does require all systems to have uniques SYSID. This requirement is >described in SCRT manual. Oh yes, I now rereaded that part. Thanks for the reminder. >SCRT is REALLY BAD product, I know several cases where it gives false results >even if you fulfill all the requirem

Re: Syslog missing (now: SCRT)

2012-05-16 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2012-05-16 12:42, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze: [...] I changed sysid to meet SCRT requirements, otherwise SCRT cannot prepare correct report for the LPAR running this system. Yuck! Could you be kind to elaborate on this required change? I'm also using this SCRT toy every month. SCRT does