We used the Vanguard Corporation to help with a project to convert one site's
CA-TSS security to RACF. We also used the same corporation to convert another
site from CA-ACF2 to RACF. We also use the Vanguard Security Administration
and Reporting products to enhance the RACF sec
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:33:48 -0400, Perry Mayes GRC.GC.CA> wrote:
>
>>
>>Has anyone done this with success?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
> I worked with a previous installation that had a mixture of RACF and TSS
> systems in a sysplex with no problems. Granted, this w
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:33:48 -0400, Perry Mayes wrote:
>
>Has anyone done this with success?
>
>Thanks
>
I worked with a previous installation that had a mixture of RACF and TSS
systems in a sysplex with no problems. Granted, this was a 'Bronzeplex' by
IBM'
perhaps the real issue is that a knowledgeable auditor will burn you but
good. They'd argue that shared dasd needs to be protected by a shared security
database.
The good news is that the two are close enough that conversion from TSS to RACF
is not that bad.
IMNSHO: pick one.
-
parallel sysplex secured with TSS. We want to
> introduce a 4th machine into the plex which will essentially be a DB2
> server. In order to keep costs manageable we will be running our IBM
> software using the zNALC license model including RACF.
>
> Has anyone done this
Good day:
We are running a 3 system parallel sysplex secured with TSS. We want to
introduce a 4th machine into the plex which will essentially be a DB2 server.
In order to keep costs manageable we will be running our IBM software using the
zNALC license model including RACF.
Has anyone
joa...@swbell.net (John McKown) writes:
> TSS could be Top Secret Security - a replacement for RACF from CA. It is
> still an active product. CA could likely tell you more.
>
> Could you possibly mean TSS/360? It was an IBM operating system for the
> S/360. There was also a TSS/37
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 14:01 +0200, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
> Hi
>
> If some help me to find something about TSS
> (I find only some very old descriptions)
>
TSS could be Top Secret Security - a replacement for RACF from CA. It is
still an active product. CA could likely tell y
The TSS I know about is also known as TopSecret. It is a Computer
Associates product. You should be able to get the information on the
latest release here - http://www.ca.com/us/products/product.aspx?id=141.
CA also has the product ACF2. Both TopSecret and ACF2 are products that
replace RACF
Hi
If some help me to find something about TSS
(I find only some very old descriptions)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
HFD Technologies is pleased to announce the availability of Sec:Tool for TSS
for z/OS.
Sec:Tool is a CICS-based challenge-response system providing end-users the
capability to reset their passwords and to remove threshold suspensions
without any invention on the part of your corporate help
Bah humbug redux! Same mediocre programmer needed (me again). Slight twist
in that the security system outsources the data store to SMF. Trivial for
Top Secret, merely easy in RACF.
Did it last night, in the dark hours.Fortunately our auditors only work
in the daylight, but other interest
.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.8, TSS 9.0 and ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO)
Oops, that should have been ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO)
Fixing subject for accuracy.
Does anyone have the above combination working? We are just kicking the
tires of z/OS 1.8 in one of our sandboxes, and it seems as though TSS 9
has problems if
Oops, that should have been ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO)
Fixing subject for accuracy.
Does anyone have the above combination working? We are just kicking the
tires of z/OS 1.8 in one of our sandboxes, and it seems as though TSS 9
has problems if ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) is set in DIAG00. I find it
somewhat
Does anyone have the above combination working? We are just kicking the
tires of z/OS 1.8 in one of our sandboxes, and it seems as though TSS 9
has problems if ALLOWUSERKEY(NO) is set in DIAG00. I find it somewhat
hard to believe, but I guess I am not surprised. I did a quick search
on ca&#
Last week Jim Keohane of Multi-Platforms, Inc. wrote:
>Doess TSS or ACF2 have facilities to allow multiple
> modules to be daisy-chained when an exit in invoked?
>
>If no facilities are there any popular conventions for doing same?
>
>This would be for the case
Hi Folks,
Doess TSS or ACF2 have facilities to allow multiple modules to be
daisy-chained when an exit in invoked?
If no facilities are there any popular conventions for doing same?
This would be for the case where a vendor and the customer (or multiple
vendors) supply the same exit
On 2/24/2006 12:46 PM, Jim Keohane wrote:
Has anyone heard of R_Admin/IRRSEQ00 invoking ACF2 or TSS at least for just
a TSO admin command via function code ADMN_RUN_COMD?
R_Admin/IRRSEQ00 is a SAF Callable Service. The SAF implies some standard usage
across different ESM's (ext
Has anyone heard of R_Admin/IRRSEQ00 invoking ACF2 or TSS at least for just
a TSO admin command via function code ADMN_RUN_COMD?
R_Admin/IRRSEQ00 is a SAF Callable Service. The SAF implies some standard
usage across different ESM's (external security managers) like RACF, ACF2
Anyone successfully using CA's TSS release 8 with the old, unsupported
CICS 4.1? We are trying to upgrade to z/OS 1.7 and found that TSS
release 8 is required for z/OS 1.7. However, we have been told that TSS
release 8 will not work with CICS 4.1.
Thanks,
Chuck Kreiter
Lead Sy
I don't know what TSS option 14 and PRIVPGM are but the following may help.
RACF enforces program control via two mechanisms:
One mechanism is data set access. In order to execute a program,
the user must have at least execute access to the library that the program
resid
Hello all,
We're a TSS shop with option 14 configured. That means that our PRIVPGM
programs can be executed from linklist or any other library if no LIB()
parameter is especified.
We're considering to switch off option 14. Then, all PRIVPGM programs
without LIB(), only will be
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 05/24/2005
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Subject: TSS
To some of us, TSS refers to software a good deal older than CA.
Google for "360/67".
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see &l
...
In the vein of Juan's much missed queries, how did TSS come about???
...
There was a discussion a couple of months ago on this.
DataCrown, then CrownTech, then DataCrown, then ISM, then IGS, all in Canada.
A few SYSPROGs wrote a security system called ACCESS.
It, in general, used
24 matches
Mail list logo
