On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:28:34 +0100, J. Cassidy wrote:
>Would not be the first time that someone logged off instead of
>disconnecting a z/OS guest.
>
>There again, if the z/OS guest was disconnected in an "unclean" way that
>is a another thing altogether.
>
>In the z/VM OPERATOR log, also search fo
-VM guest z-OS system diagnostics
John,
have a gander in the z/VM OPERATOR log at about the time the event happened.
Would not be the first time that someone logged off instead of
disconnecting a z/OS guest.
There again, if the z/OS guest was disconnected in an "unclean" way
John,
have a gander in the z/VM OPERATOR log at about the time the event happened.
Would not be the first time that someone logged off instead of
disconnecting a z/OS guest.
There again, if the z/OS guest was disconnected in an "unclean" way that
is a another thing altogether.
In the z/VM OPER
One of the first investigative tasks handed to me at my new job...
...and I don't know where to start.
Got a z-OS 1.9 system, that runs as a guest under z/VM. (It's a long time since
I last worked with such a combination. Last time it was VM/370(?) and MVS
1.3.0e, alongside a bunch of DOS/VSE
4 matches
Mail list logo
