On 10/1/2012 10:02 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Really?
The initiator stores the STEPLIB DCB address in TCBJLB; when
there is no STEPLIB, it uses JOBLIB if supplied. So it's one or
the other, not both.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
---
Really?
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity.
Charles
J R wrote:
The search order never includes both STEPLIB and JOBLIB. For any given jobstep
they are mutually exclusive.
> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:43:34 -0500
> From: mark.ste...@wnco.com
> Subject: Re: Search problem
> To
The search order never includes both STEPLIB and JOBLIB. For any given jobstep
they are mutually exclusive.
> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:43:34 -0500
> From: mark.ste...@wnco.com
> Subject: Re: Search problem
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Sorry the search order is steplib, joblib, then LNKL
David:
What a coincidence.
I just did this last week.
I had a several month old full volume copy of my test spool and checkpoint,
which I needed to restore to see if I could recreate a problem.
The JES2 checkpoint dataset contains pointers to all of the spool
volumes, plus the Master record wit
>Has anyone seen this NY Times article? Perhaps the reporter should have
>looked in the Times Tower for how they are saving power. Mainframes are far
>more efficient, and these CIO's and companies are doing whatever they can do
>to get rid of them. Maybe the Times needs a mirror
Well, besi
I've never used it for this particular purpose, but a secondary JES2 might
fill the bill. For one thing, whatever pondering you do under the
secondary would not affect the primary. And once the secondary is running,
you can use SDSF to look at spool content. It's a bit tricky to set up but
perf
On 10/01/2012 04:32 PM, David Andrews wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:48 -0400, Chambers, David W. wrote:
Since you're IPLing the Test LPAR you could temporarily relabel the
BEBS... volumes to the original BEBC... volume serials and respond
with the appropriate reply to the DUPLICATE VOLUME mess
Is this your issue? http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21025747
This was found just doing an internet search on IXG002E
If it is not, do you see any additional messages in JOBLOG or SYSLOG at the
time of this error? Did you see any other IXG messages? If so, please provide
all m
Hi all we are going from version 1.11 to 1.13 and are having problems
defining our log files. We are getting the error IXG002E LOGR POLICY
PROCESSING ENDED WITH RETCODE=0008 RSNCODE=0805 IXG003I LOGR POLICY
PROCESSING ENCOUNTERED AN UNEXPECTED ERROR when defining the files. In
looking at t
Has anyone seen this NY Times article? Perhaps the reporter should have
looked in the Times Tower for how they are saving power. Mainframes are far
more efficient, and these CIO's and companies are doing whatever they can do
to get rid of them. Maybe the Times needs a mirror
Doug
http://www.
Sorry the search order is steplib, joblib, then LNKLST.
Thanks
>
>I am testing z/OS v1r13. I am also testing CA-OPS/MVS. I have something
>strange happening when I try to process the OPS-LOG. I have a steplib in my
>logon proc and in all the started tasks for OPS/MVS. ISRFIND finds the module
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:48 -0400, Chambers, David W. wrote:
> Since you're IPLing the Test LPAR you could temporarily relabel the
> BEBS... volumes to the original BEBC... volume serials and respond
> with the appropriate reply to the DUPLICATE VOLUME message at IPL
> time. And the production volu
I don't think this is a CA-OPS/MVS problem. I have already contacted CA and
they don't have an answer why it appears to be searching the LNKLST first.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler [mailto:stars...@mindspring.com]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 4:29 PM
To: Mark Steely
I am testing z/OS v1r13. I am also testing CA-OPS/MVS. I have something strange
happening when I try to process the OPS-LOG. I have a steplib in my logon proc
and in all the started tasks for OPS/MVS. ISRFIND finds the module in my logon
steplib and also in the LNKLST for the old release. When I
Since you're IPLing the Test LPAR you could temporarily relabel the BEBS...
volumes to the original BEBC... volume serials and respond with the appropriate
reply to the DUPLICATE VOLUME message at IPL time. And the production volumes
would also be offline to your Test LPAR. Just make sure you've
>John's reason #7 reminds me of when management was sugar coating the decision
>to outsource our entire shop, how it would 'bolster your personal portfolio'!
> win-win!
Well, to each his own. You can either resist change, or you can embrace it. I
chose to embrace it. I think it has extend
Hi,
How (or where) can I find in RMF the normalization factors for specialty
engines (zIIP, zAAP) [R723NFFI (zAAPs) or R723NFFS (zIIPs)] against
kneecapped GP processors?
Or the SMF70NRM value from TYPE70?
Products such as MICS or MXG will do this conversion for you, but I don't
have them in m
Do you just want to look at the data on the SPOOL volumes? Or do you need to
do something more.
Any Checkpoint dataset is going to want to be the active one.
Lizette
PS Do you have a standalone sandbox?
-Original Message-
>From: David Andrews
>Sent: Oct 1, 2012 1:28 PM
>To: IBM-MA
Responding to my own post again.
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:18 -0400, David Andrews wrote:
> What did I do wrong?
"JES2 does not support moving the checkpoint data set from one volume
serial to another unless the checkpoint dialog is used."
Wonder if I can do that when the old checkpoint volume is
I have a months-old full volume backup of a set of JES2 spool volumes
and their corresponding checkpoint volumes. I'd like to get at the
content of those spool volumes.
So I restore those volumes to new throwaway volume serials (starting
with "BEB"), IPL a test LPAR, and start up a JES2 with
John's reason #7 reminds me of when management was sugar coating the decision
to outsource our entire shop, how it would 'bolster your personal portfolio'!
win-win!
Dana
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i
I just tried and all is fine.
Todd
University of Chicago
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thanks! That led to solving it. RPTOPTS(ON) did not do anything, which was
the clue that LE was not seeing my PARM= run time options, I guess due to
one of those "how to parse or not parse PARM=" options (which I can never
keep track of).
I moved both RPTOPTS and POSIX to CEEOPTS and both RPTOPTS
Have you tried running with RPTOPT(ON) ? This should help you verify what
options are being used, and if multiple programs are starting.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Kirk, thanks.
>
> > Is there more than one main() program?
>
> Don't think so. My main calls C++ me
Kirk, thanks.
> Is there more than one main() program?
Don't think so. My main calls C++ methods one of which in turn calls
gsk_environment_open() and that is where and when the problem occurs. It all
works if I don't do the gsk_xxx() calls.
> How are you setting POSIX(ON)? At run time?
Yes,
Is there more than one main() program? If so and they run in the same
enclave, then they need to use the same C RTL.
How are you setting POSIX(ON)? At run time?
We generally set this option in each compile unit, via a #pragma:
#pragma runopts(POSIX(ON))
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http:/
Unable to connect to IBMLink sign-on page from Chicago area.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I've got a C++ program -- trying to use GSK for the first time, FWIW -- that
is running POSIX(ON) in z/OS batch and is receiving the above error on the
first GSK call.
I've read the manual description of the message but I don't quite understand
what they are trying to tell me. I'm not the guy res
>Also, I was nodding in agreement with John McKown up until he wrote that "most
>successful migration projects [from mainframes] deliver a positive ROI
Actually, you blame the wrong John for this quote. And it was somewhat taken
out of context. I was careful to point out that many migrations f
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:43:21 -0400, micheal butz
wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I am running a TSO command processor which needs to be APF authorized
>
>
> The load library is in PROG00 marked as APF authorized
>
> The command name is both in AUTHPGM and AUTHNAMES in IKJTSO00
>
>
>I know that both PROG00 an
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> För Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Skickat: den 30 september 2012 15:18
> Till: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Ämne: Re: Another Light goes out
>
> In
> ,
> on 09/29/2012
>at 04:29 PM, Timothy
>[snip]... Peter: what happens if STRINGRANGE is disabled?
As the message says, the third argument (5) will be trimmed to fit (i.e.
3 will be used). For the following source code
TEST09: PROC OPTIONS(MAIN);
DCL SOURCE CHAR(10) INIT('0123456789');
DCL TARGET CHAR(10) VAR INI
32 matches
Mail list logo
