W dniu 2014-03-22 03:55, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:06:05 -0500, TonyICLOUD wrote:
In the "bad old days" this was called a Suicide Sort. Sadly, it was
often necessitated by lack of disk space, or horror of horrors, lack of
scratch tapes. I remember a time, with a spendthrift
t...@harminc.net (Tony Harminc) writes:
> For many years (decades, actually) there have been other products (IBM
> and non-IBM) that talk the NJE protocols. Most notably, IBM's RSCS on
> VM uses an overlapping subset of the same protocol, and is
> interoperable. There have been NJE implementations
On 3/17/2014 2:05 PM, R.S. wrote:
Local terminals do not need VTAM, if you're willing to do the work to
mimic normal SNA packets with EXCP (or variant). While it's not for
the faint-hearted, it can be done. Doing the same for remotes would
additionally require changes to your front-end, and is mu
On 3/17/2014 6:38 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
For local non-SNA you don't even need to do that. In fact, I wan't
aware that you had written EXCP-based code for local SNA clusters; I
thought that it was strictly non-SNA.
At one point one of my employers planned to convert everything to
On 3/18/2014 4:20 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
You don't; SVS was OS/VS2 R1 and MVS was OS/VS2 R12 and later. OS/VS1
was the upgrade from OS/360 MFT.
Just to confuse the issue - I thought VS1 to be an upgrade of MFT II?
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, Vermont
Hi All,
Might not be the best place to ask this, but does anyone have Doug's
ISPFHTML tool with them? It seems Doug's sillysot.com site is down. Is
there another link? I've used the tool a lot before.
Thanks,
Quasar C.
--
For IB