On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:27:28 +, Storr, Lon A CTR USARMY HRC (US) wrote:
>
>When a dataset is deleted, it is scratched and its DSCB in the VTOC is freed.
>Hence, as far as I know, the dataset's data can only be accessed in one of two
>ways:
>
Pedantry: "have no DSCB"? Is there not in fact a D
I find it very entertaining to consider that groups that repeatedly complain
about the gross incompetence of the government, will in the next breath
pontificate on how that same incompetent government manages to conduct nearly
omniscient feats of intelligence and maintain conspiracies comprised
SHARE?s Call for Presentations ends on Friday, April 18th. The MVS Storage
Project is still looking for user experience presentations. If you have enabled
one of the many new SMS or MVS/Catalog features recently (such as EAV
exploitation, RLS for the MVS/Catalog, RLS for the DFSMShsm CDS, or CA
>From years of experience the x'02' is the query. If that's not on, you
gets what's dealt so to speak. As one of the local auto dealers says
'irregardless'.
In a message dated 4/14/2014 4:55:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com writes:
PSERVIC=X'02804450448E
On 4/14/2014 1:00 PM, Alan Haff wrote:
This idea looked promising so I built a few logmode table entries on our
test system to see how Extra reacts to different combinations of primary
and secondary screen size definitions. I can confirm that Extra does not
behave well when it receives a bind tha
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:12 AM, George, William@FTB <
bill.geo...@ftb.ca.gov> wrote:
> Ok, I'll contact them to see if what they have setup. Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Mike Schwab
> Sent: Monday, A
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:24:26 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:46:44 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>>On 4/11/2014 1:11 PM, George, William wrote:
>>> I received an off list email from Attachmate who stated that after speaking
>>> with their support group , Extra doesn't have the ability
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:46:44 -0700, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
>On 4/11/2014 1:11 PM, George, William@FTB wrote:
>> I received an off list email from Attachmate who stated that after speaking
>> with their support group , Extra doesn't have the ability to define custom
>> screen sizes. :(
>
>No custom
Ok, I'll contact them to see if what they have setup. Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Emulator Screen Size with Attachm
The system programmer at your site defines the logmode and its parameters.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:14 AM, George, William@FTB
wrote:
> Thanks Linda. But, where would I define the screen parameters, for example;
> 60 x 132?
>
> Bill
---
Great memory Mike. After removing leading zeros, WLM is classifying as
expected.
Thank you very much...mystery solved.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu wi
The continuing trickle of Snowden revelations needs to be considered
in all of these discussions.
It is not clear---It is not indeed very likely---that the NSA knows
just what documents Snowden obtained copies of. The only documents
that he can be known certainly to have copied are those that he
John,
While the Redbook web page touts 'Last Update 03 April 2014', The title page
still lists October 2013 date, and the document number is still -00. The
section '3.1.1 Installation Manager' still looks the same as the copy I was
working from.
Dana
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:26:42 -0400, Jo
How about running your initialization routine from a job or started task
instead of via SSI
definition? You would need a small driver that calls your init routine
from that job
or STC. You could even write a small program to cleanup the environment
before rerunning
the init job/STC.
Once you'r
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:24:05 +, Chase, John wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I learned via PMR that Rational Developer for System z ("RDz") v9.x ("latest &
>greatest") does not "officially" support Enterprise COBOL v5.1. The
>workaround suggested by RDz Support was to specify COBOL v4.2 and
>XMLPARSE(XM
Thanks Linda. But, where would I define the screen parameters, for example; 60
x 132?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Linda
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 4:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Emulator
Tom Longfellow wrote:
I have sucessfully installed the IBM HTTP Server Powered by Apache.
I was only successful by not following the instructions that you are
following.
I'm told the redbook was updated on April 3, and available here:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp4987.html?Open
I am not a totally confirmed cynic. I have simply learned that officials
cannot be trusted to tell the truth. Part of the reason is that the very few
times that they do tell the truth are never publicized. So I usually ignore
anything that an official says. That way I am not fooled if he's
Bill Fairchild (DASDBILL2) wrote:
>If the NSA, CIA, IRS, DEA, BATFE, FBI, DOD, DOJ, BLM, US Presidents, CEOs of
>major corporations, etc., repeatedly and provably lie after the fact when
>asked if they did such and such, why should we believe them before the fact
>(meaning before anyone has acc
>How the NSA shot itself in the foot by denying prior knowledge of Heartbleed
>vulnerability
>http://www.zdnet.com/institutional-failure-led-to-nsa-missing-the-heartbleed-flaw-728366
>
If the NSA, CIA, IRS, DEA, BATFE, FBI, DOD, DOJ, BLM, US Presidents, CEOs of
major corporations, etc.,
Possibly the ADRDSSU or some other authorized program is OPENing a DCB,
modifying its DEB, then when finished with that DCB it CLOSEs the DCB without
having previously restored the DEB's contents that it altered, so that CLOSE
cannot find the same DEB with the same contents that it uses for all
In <984dfc2f94c72c4c9e9acbfd71e4feee0bf...@fg1014.ftb.ca.gov>, on
04/11/2014
at 04:41 PM, "George, William@FTB" said:
>As far as my site? We are on z/OS 01.13.00 (ISPF 6.3), VTAM 6.1.D
>so whatever these offer
VTAM offers whatever you define; ISPF may impose some restrictions.
Does your 32
Hi All,
I learned via PMR that Rational Developer for System z ("RDz") v9.x ("latest &
greatest") does not "officially" support Enterprise COBOL v5.1. The workaround
suggested by RDz Support was to specify COBOL v4.2 and XMLPARSE(XMLSS) in the
RDz wizard, because COBOL v5.1 does not support XM
This is going back about 10 years since I did IMS work, but I seem to
remember that you need to get rid of the leading zeros on the NAME values.
Mike
On 12 April 2014 03:08, Gerhard Adam wrote:
> From the Planning Workload Manager book:
>
> Under Transaction Class:
>
> IMS
> The CLASS ke
24 matches
Mail list logo
