ibm-m...@tpg.com.au (Shane Ginnane) writes:
> Not surprisingly, since they very earliest reports of such successes,
> there were murmurings that a large proportion of the fundamental
> research had been done/financed by organisations closely aligned to
> the former employer of a certain Mr Edward S
>From what i see so far, we will have to be killed to be teleported...
Well.. the original at any rate. :-)
Rob Schramm
On Jun 1, 2014 8:31 PM, "Shane Ginnane" wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 09:02:43 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
>
> >What are new, many of them dating only from 2013, are reports of t
Radoslaw Skorupka writes:
>* RAIM as memory redundancy is not unique to mainframes.
It is, actually. More precisely, nobody else seems to have done anything
except "Level 1" mirroring(*), rarely even that, and even then not
always/usually in hardware. It's a question of how many hard failures are
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 09:02:43 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
>What are new, many of them dating only from 2013, are reports of the
>experimental observation and verification of quantum entanglement in
>engineering contexts.
Not surprisingly, since they very earliest reports of such successes, there
On 6/1/2014 7:51 PM, Peter Relson wrote:
I believe the answer is "no", all other things being equal.
But if one of those "other things" is that the non-aligned operand spans
cache lines whereas an aligned one would not, then the answer could be a
huge "yes".
Things such as doubleword (or quadwo
I haven't used INFOMVS for going on 19 years. I don't even know if IBM ships
the monthly database updates any longer, which if not I'd be amazed that anyone
is still paying the monthly license charge for the product.
Just my .02
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
As Rob Scott correctly stated, there is no operator command.
>Are System level Name Token Pairs anchored from the CVT ?
ECVTNTTP has a comment that would lead you to think that that is the
anchor.
>Can I write my own routine...?
Silly question. Of course you "can". Anyone authorized enough can w
I believe the answer is "no", all other things being equal.
But if one of those "other things" is that the non-aligned operand spans
cache lines whereas an aligned one would not, then the answer could be a
huge "yes".
Things such as doubleword (or quadword) consistency could not be relied
upon
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014g.html#75 non-IBM: SONY new tape storage - 185
Terabytes on a tape.
when I got to play disk enginneer in bldgs 14&15 ... some
old posts
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#disk
got to work some with person that got original RAID patent
http://en.wikipedia
Hi Folks,
I'd like to take a straw poll. There is some JCL in the CBT Tape to
load an INFOMVS database with CBT Tape data. Should I get rid of it?
Does anybody use INFOMVS anymore? Here's a chance to say what you
think. Maybe I'll just separate it out and move it to the pds which is
F
W dniu 2014-05-31 13:58, Scott Chapman pisze:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 13:47:26 +0200, R.S. wrote:
Well, defence without attack.
Sorry--not meaning to defend nor offend. Just wanted to point out that which
many of us already understand, but which the uninitiated, stumbling upon this
conversation,
Thanks, John, exactly the sort of information I was looking for. Do you
recall what the hardware was?
I am leaning toward aligning it. If I can gain a couple of milliseconds of
CPU time per customer per day in return for coding + 1 & 0xfffe once I
think that's worth it.
OTOH, it will make the
Hi,
Yes, I know, it's still for sale...
I've been looking to get it, as image or html+css, but all I could find are the
plain formats (green/white/green/white), whereas I "needed" the
==
--
--
--
==
type. In the end I resorted to scanning an old cut, and using Gimp I've n
harris...@gmail.com (Graham Harris) writes:
> I recall Storagetek talking about RAIT around a decade ago. Not sure if
> anything came of it in the mainframe space. The concept seems to be 'out
> there' on other platforms.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014f.html#64 non-IBM: SONY new tape stora
There is a performance penalty. I have measured it for aligned and
unaligned signed halfword, i.e., signed binary fixed(15,0), in
compiled PL/I code and found that it is usually about 13%, which may
be trivial or important depending upon context.
More important in multiple-CP environments, I thi
Shane Ginnane's point is well taken. Erwin Schrödinger (1887-1961)
described entanglement as one of the 'central principles' of quantum
mechanics; and there is a discussion, pellucid but not for
mathematical dropouts, of entanglement in the first English-language
edition of John von Neumann's book
I recall Storagetek talking about RAIT around a decade ago. Not sure if
anything came of it in the mainframe space. The concept seems to be 'out
there' on other platforms.
On 1 June 2014 01:41, Mike Schwab wrote:
> There is Error Correcting Code to help recover each block. Up from
> Parity
17 matches
Mail list logo
