Re: Binder SYSPRINT wrap?

2014-11-21 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2014-11-20, at 13:25, Charles Mills wrote: Just to annoy you. I hadn't known they cared. I suppose I should be flattered. Original message From: Paul Gilmartin Date:11/20/2014 9:57 AM (GMT-08:00) Browsing a Binder SYSPRINT, I notice that lines in *** DATA SET

AW: Re: Page Data Set Sizes and Volume Types

2014-11-21 Thread Peter Hunkeler
My old ROT was 2-3x the real memory on the LPAR. Now that we can have 16, 32, 64GB partitions, we're talking some real DASD here. Multiply by 10. Two of our larger LPARs have 640GB each. -- Peter Hunkeler -- For

Re: Batch Msgid Profile

2014-11-21 Thread Staller, Allan
IKJEFF10? snip Is there a Default table or exit that is/can be set for all batch submits, so it would work without entering the 'PROF MSGID WTPMSG'? /snip -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

Re: What are STC, JOB and TSU?

2014-11-21 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In CAFO-8toTThE4dNeA1xxZFRDByzWZts=m4sqst+6arue07gu...@mail.gmail.com, on 11/20/2014 at 01:49 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said: Any guesses We don't need no stinking guesses. what STC *means*? Started Task Control. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position;

Forbes article: Mainframe: Engine of Digital Transformation

2014-11-21 Thread Mark Regan
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbloomberg/2014/11/21/mainframe-engine-of-digital-transformation/   Thanks, Mark Regan, USNR-Ret, 1969-1991 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: Binder SYSPRINT wrap?

2014-11-21 Thread Don Imbriale
That would be too easy. Many things seems to annoy the OP. Maybe there's a platform out there with fewer nits to pick. On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote: Just to annoy you. Charles Sent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity Original

Re: Binder SYSPRINT wrap?

2014-11-21 Thread John McKown
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Don Imbriale don.imbri...@gmail.com wrote: That would be too easy. Many things seems to annoy the OP. Maybe there's a platform out there with fewer nits to pick. ​I think gil has more of a UNIX background. When you are used to truly long lines, the z/OS use

Does z/OS V1R13 CSF support TLS v1.2?

2014-11-21 Thread Charles Mills
I call gsk_attribute_set_enum(env_handle, GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2, GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2_ON) and get RC 701 Attribute identifier is not valid. The same code works on V2R1 so either the answer to my question is Yes, or else something is hosed up on my V1R13 system. I'd like to know which it is.

Re: Does z/OS V1R13 CSF support TLS v1.2?

2014-11-21 Thread Brian France
For z/OS 1.13 there's a PTF. Sorry off hand I do not know it. On 11/21/2014 3:43 PM, Charles Mills wrote: I call gsk_attribute_set_enum(env_handle, GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2, GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2_ON) and get RC 701 Attribute identifier is not valid. The same code works on V2R1 so either the answer

Re: Binder SYSPRINT wrap?

2014-11-21 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:37:40 -0600, John McKown wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Don Imbriale wrote: That would be too easy. Many things seems to annoy the OP. Maybe there's a platform out there with fewer nits to pick. ​I think gil has more of a UNIX background. When you are used to

Re: Binder SYSPRINT wrap?

2014-11-21 Thread Charles Mills
For the record let me say I was not dinging the OP for being a nitpicker. No such implication was intended. It just seemed that the question itself was unanswerable. I have a friend who used to be the systems programming manager for a large retailer. When his people would come to him with

Re: Binder SYSPRINT wrap?

2014-11-21 Thread Bill Godfrey
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:51:14 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: For the record let me say I was not dinging the OP for being a nitpicker. No such implication was intended. It just seemed that the question itself was unanswerable. I have a friend who used to be the systems programming manager for a

Re: AW: Re: Page Data Set Sizes and Volume Types

2014-11-21 Thread Clark Morris
On 21 Nov 2014 07:35:43 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: My old ROT was 2-3x the real memory on the LPAR. Now that we can have 16, 32, 64GB partitions, we're talking some real DASD here. Multiply by 10. Two of our larger LPARs have 640GB each. I didn't know that an individual

AW: Re: AW: Re: Page Data Set Sizes and Volume Types

2014-11-21 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Multiply by 10. Two of our larger LPARs have 640GB each. I didn't know that an individual instance could be that large. Without revealing any company secrets could you tell what combination of systems can use that much memory above the bar? Sure, there are not country secrets here. It's

Why is the System Data Sets book no longer deemed useful?

2014-11-21 Thread Peter Hunkeler
As the System Data Set Definition book hasn't been published in rather a long time ... Why is this? Isn't this a valuable book for those new to z/OS (and for us old guys with shrinking memories as well)? IBM makes us believe how serious they take it to get new people aboard on z/OS. Good,