Peter Hunkeler wrote:
And who can we be sure Josef Reichman isn't just another name you've
arbitrarily chosen?
With that, I need to say that I've had business emails in the past from
a Joseph Reichman and the originating IP address matches the michelbutz
posts. So it's either Joe, or it's o
I would like to know the what rules are for posting
Let IBMMAIN require proof of IDENTITY
I didn't see that anywhere
Are *YOU* sure everybody is who they say they are
And Please don't misspell my name its Joseph
With PH not with a F
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 1:45 AM, Peter Hu
>> What the big deal I didn't want to use my real name never saw that as one of
>> the requirements for
>> Using IBMMAIN
>>
> My real name is Joseph Reichman
What a big deal?? Do *you* like to communicate with people who think they have
a need to hide their real personality? I definitely do
As one more example, VSAM enjoys a 64-bit buffer pool when you configure a
monoplex or multiplex with a Coupling Facility, even if you're not
otherwise taking advantage of VSAM Record Level Sharing (RLS) features.
With a 64-bit buffer pool you could see VSAM-related performance
improvements even in
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:58:27 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>>Presumably they decided to move the timestamp field rather than whatever
>>field the tested bit is in. Probably there are lots of places that test the
>>(incorrect) bit, and just one that stores the TOD clock value there, so
>>less code ne
And so is hardware. Such as internet backbones. I have an i7-4930K processor in
my PC. Still trying to figure out what the 'Identity Protection Feature' is for
and how to turn it off. I suspect it's not for my benefit.
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/10/18/
ibm_source_code_chinese_government/
Another take on the "deal"
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the mes
Ah, my "no subject" post was rejected by the tooling.
>I assume the repair is to test the correct bit, ignoring the
>correct store of the system clock.
The assumption is incorrect.
>Are all defective macros (even non-GUPI) repaired?
There are no macros involved. The fix is complete.
>Presum
W dniu 2015-10-18 o 19:41, Field, Alan pisze:
My HMC access via a browser to the Integrated 3270 and Operating System
messages broke again.
It is a JAVA problem. I had been running JAVA V7.21 but it won't reinstall
properly again. I have JAVA 8.60 installed and it doesn't start either of the
Thanks Skip for the reassurance that it works. I'll keep digging.
Alan Field
Systems Engineer Principal
Blue Cross Blue Shield of MN
651.662.3546
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of J O Skip Robinson
Sent: Sunday, Octobe
Both functions are working for me today. Java level:
java version "1.8.0_60"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_60-b27)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 25.60-b23, mixed mode)
We have had Java problems off and on but finally standardized on this version
after upgrading all HMCs to the
My HMC access via a browser to the Integrated 3270 and Operating System
messages broke again.
It is a JAVA problem. I had been running JAVA V7.21 but it won't reinstall
properly again. I have JAVA 8.60 installed and it doesn't start either of the
functions.
My HMC microcode is at a high level
CA-IDMS will exploit coupling facility features if desired (shared buffers
between environments, and datasharing groups)
Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect
Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
choelsc...@humana.com
Humana.com
What the big deal I didn't want to use my real name never saw that as one of
the requirements for
Using IBMMAIN
So Peter Relson and all the IBM'er want to know
Okay they help me out as they know the code
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>
> So, w
So, why michelbutz?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: michelbutz
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 19:44
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IEAVAPE2/IEAVPSE2 another address space
Thank you
My real name is Joseph Reichman
And I have licensed copy
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 13:25:04 +0300, גדי בן אבי wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was asked to provide a list of functions that can benefit from having a
>coupling facility available.
>
>I looked for a list, but couldn�t find a current one.
>The current environment is:
>z/OS v2.1
>Basic sysplex � connectivity ach
W dniu 2015-10-18 o 12:25, גדי בן אבי pisze:
Hi,
I was asked to provide a list of functions that can benefit from having a
coupling facility available.
I looked for a list, but couldn’t find a current one.
The current environment is:
z/OS v2.1
Basic sysplex – connectivity achieved by ESCON CTC
Hi,
I was asked to provide a list of functions that can benefit from having a
coupling facility available.
I looked for a list, but couldn’t find a current one.
The current environment is:
z/OS v2.1
Basic sysplex – connectivity achieved by ESCON CTC’s
One CEC
Shared JES2 spool.
VTAM connectivity
18 matches
Mail list logo
