When I looked as some old SYSLOG data, it appears there can be several events
that may occur between the IEC205 message
and the IEC234K Keep Message for the same job. No real delay in this example,
but it does show events.
(And ONLY after the accidental selection of this by message sequence and
On 4/14/2016 1:11 PM, Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta) wrote:
CHECK DECB1
LHWORK1,DCBBLKSI Block size at time of READ
L WORK2,DECB1+16 Status area address
SHWORK1,14(WORK2) WORK1 has block lengt
Did someone change your VTS replication policy? Sounds like it is now
having to wait for the volume to be fully transferred to another VTS to
assure you have two copies, before the rewind/unload is allowed to
complete.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.idao3
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 19:12:12 +, Staller, Allan
wrote:
>Are you recording SMF 19? IIRC this can greatly elongate the SMF dump process
>as the system goes to touch every online volume for each SMF dataset switch.
>
Right - at SMF switch time. But the problem seems to be at the end of the
Are you recording SMF 19? IIRC this can greatly elongate the SMF dump process
as the system goes to touch every online volume for each SMF dataset switch.
In your SMF dump job, add buffers, especially on the tape side. I am currently
running with 50 and may increase it some more.
The combinat
My first SHARE meeting was in San Francisco in February 1964, and the
first session was a report by the "3-by-3" committee to describe what had
been rumored as "Fortran 6". It was then called the New Programming
Language (NPL). Because the NPL acronym also applied to the UK's National
Physica
The environment is IBM virtual tape and we write a new each time.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 1:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF dump processing
On Thu
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:09:49 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:02:07 +, Lopez, Sharon wrote:
>
>>We have noticed that our dumping for SMF MAN files are taking longer than
>>usual. We see in the job log that when message IEC205I is issued, which
>>shows the total blocks wri
Interesting tidbit of info on this code in the manual that Greg pointed me to:
This code works perfectly as written:
...
CHECK DECB1
LHWORK1,DCBBLKSI Block size at time of READ
L WORK2,DECB1+16 Status area
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:02:07 +, Lopez, Sharon wrote:
>We have noticed that our dumping for SMF MAN files are taking longer than
>usual. We see in the job log that when message IEC205I is issued, which shows
>the total blocks written, that sometimes it takes as long as 15 minutes for
>mess
We have noticed that our dumping for SMF MAN files are taking longer than
usual. We see in the job log that when message IEC205I is issued, which shows
the total blocks written, that sometimes it takes as long as 15 minutes for
message IEF234E K to occur. Has anyone else encountered this or c
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:42:23 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>Pete wrote:
And most of us don't know what it was that Pete wrote, because he
apparently posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main. Fortunately for him, this
time two knowledgeable people (John and Kurt) seem to have seen his
posts there and respond
View Direct is from ASG not CA. Previous owner was Mobius with the product
name Infopac.
There is no direct way of finding out what report is on what tape, however,
there is a database listing report RIN6002 section Report Version Table that
contains the info you are looking for.
CIT | Ken
So an update to my quest of knowledge...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_domain_socket and
http://www.thomasstover.com/uds.html
The bottom line is this form of "socket" is integral for any process to process
communication not just networking, amy I going down the right path?
_
Rado,
I certaily did prepare that. All LPARS; CF's; coupling datasets etc is usable
native on the CEC since I can reach it all.
Thanks
Werner
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to li
W dniu 2016-04-14 o 16:02, Werner Zieleznik pisze:
Hi,
thanks.
Well, like mentioned, it seems initializing the sysplex in inevitable. That
kind of work and extra loops like going to XCFLOCAL; run the jobs etc.. IPL
again with MULTISYSTEM is not that complicated. I agree with that point. I was
Hi,
thanks.
Well, like mentioned, it seems initializing the sysplex in inevitable. That
kind of work and extra loops like going to XCFLOCAL; run the jobs etc.. IPL
again with MULTISYSTEM is not that complicated. I agree with that point. I was
only wondering if it is avoidable since there is
On 4/14/2016 9:15 AM, Werner Zieleznik wrote:
Hi,
what you're describing is exactly what I tried. It's failing because HCD will
not allow to define a coupling link from the native CF on the CEC to the z/VM
LPAR. So the sysplex will not find the path form the old sysplex under z/VM to
the CF o
I am trying to understand the function of TCPIP and its "max sockets". We are
experiencing a problem that happens infrequently where our CICS application
closing down the DataPower port with an error that indicates max sockets has
been reached. IBM support has confirmed this in a dump. They s
Hi,
:-) did read that as well and accept it as a fact.
I was wondering if anyone has got a workaround to prevent initialzing the
sysplex.
...but I think its inevitable.
Thanks
Werner
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a
This:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ieaf100/hfourv.htm
seems to say that a z/OS sysplex must reside completely within a single
z/VM system or completely outside it.
z/VM is able to simulate advanced Coupling Facility (CF) and Message
Facility (MF) funct
Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
in between this time I received and the enhanced hold data...
Ah hah! I highly suspect the latest HOLDDATA is the reason for the
discrepancy. I'm pretty sure the PSP bucket instructs you to first get
the latest HOLDDATA before running the REPORT MISSINGFIX command.
Hi,
what you're describing is exactly what I tried. It's failing because HCD will
not allow to define a coupling link from the native CF on the CEC to the z/VM
LPAR. So the sysplex will not find the path form the old sysplex under z/VM to
the CF on the CEC.
Activating the policy with the new
Tom,
Corrections. I dug around. You are right it was formerly ASG.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
in between this time I received and the enhanced hold data...
Ah hah! I highly suspect the latest HOLDDATA is the reason for the
discrepancy. I'm pretty sure the PSP bucket instructs you to first get
the latest HOLDDATA before running the REPORT MISSINGFIX command. In
any case, glad to hea
On 4/14/2016 12:45 AM, Werner Zieleznik wrote:
Hi,
has anyone ever moved a sysplex out of z/VM to the native CEC? It seems to me
that I cant define coupling link's form the native CEC into VM. So, if I
activate a policy with new CF's on the native CEC the changes are pending and
it would not w
It is VIEWDIRECT (formerly INFOPAC).
On Thu, 4/14/16, Pinnacle wrote:
Subject: Re: QUESTION ABOUT CA-VIEWDIRECT
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Received: Thursday, April 14, 2016, 8:20 AM
On 4/14/2016 6:44 AM,
willie bunter wrote:
> Good Day To
Theo,
Check out Glen Wilcock's 'What's new in DFHSM' March 2014. This was
presented at SHARE in Anaheim in 2014. You can google it and download.
There is a section called 'Storage Tiering' which goes into detail
about SPMGCLTR (not SPGMCLTR) and the &ACSENV with examples.
HTH
Richard Marchan
On 4/14/2016 6:44 AM, willie bunter wrote:
Good Day To All,
I have a question about CA-ViewDirect. Is there a utility that I could use
that could tell me all the job outputs contained on a tape? For example,
DFHSM has the TTOC or FIXCDS A.
Each tape is cataloged and contains multi-file. T
The vendor should have provided something, but regardless, get the TAPEMAP
utility from the CBT website. You will be glad you did.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of willie bunter
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 6:42
Good Day To All,
I have a question about CA-ViewDirect. Is there a utility that I could use
that could tell me all the job outputs contained on a tape? For example,
DFHSM has the TTOC or FIXCDS A.
Each tape is cataloged and contains multi-file. The auditors would like to
have detailed info
31 matches
Mail list logo
