It locks that, I did not ask the question properly. What I want to see do I
have to stop in previous all the LPARs getting the time from this CTN, because
I feel if any LPAR see that the CTN name changed it may have some corruption
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Dana Mitche
Of course I'm aware of DFSMSdss. Hint: z/OS DFSMSdss supports a certain
range of devices, and so does Linux on z. The list of supported devices
varies a bit.
Offline replies are also appreciated if preferred. Thanks.
Certainly the concatenation of SMPPTS libraries is recorded in the zone by
DDDEF. My point was that the particular library that a PTF is located in at any
given time is not 'recorded'. Whenever a PTF is needed, the PTS concatenation
is searched for the member. If the DDDEF is changed, the new li
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:13:58 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>You can concatenate them or just build a new SMPPTS and change the name in the
>DDEF
>
>https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.gim2000/dspts1.htm
>
Much of this can be emulated with symbolic links: ei
You can concatenate them or just build a new SMPPTS and change the name in the
DDEF
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.gim2000/dspts1.htm
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dan
I thought the SMMPTSx DDDEF was recorded in the global zone and that
consolidating could not easily be done.
Dan
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 19:26 Gibney, Dave wrote:
> Has this always been so. Sometime ago (1.7, 1.9) I had ACCEPT fail because
> I had compressed and moved members into lower seque
Has this always been so. Sometime ago (1.7, 1.9) I had ACCEPT fail because I
had compressed and moved members into lower sequenced SMPPTSn
At least I think I remember this. I've just always added another SMPPTSz ever
since.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mail
SMP/E does not keep a permanent record of which PTS holds a particular sysmod.
On every query, the concatenated PTS libraries are searched. If the sysmod is
found, the particular library is named, otherwise 'not found'. This allows you
to freely manipulate the libraries and their content. Worst
On 2017-03-16 05:34, Timothy Sipples wrote:
A few years ago (2013) Linux started supporting "raw-track access mode" to
ECKD DASD, beginning with Linux kernel Version 3.11. Eberhard Pasch briefly
describes raw-track access mode here:
http://linuxmain.blogspot.sg/2013/11/raw-eckd-access-from-zlinu
On 2017-03-16 16:11, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Doesn't use of (add_entry) presume that you add to the table BEFORE you call
(init_subr) or (init_subr_dp)? What if initialization is set up to be done
first, before any entries at all appear in the table?
We do INIT_SUB, followed by ADD_ENTRY
Hi,
if the COBOL subroutines are compiled using NORENT, there could be another
possibility; we used this at my former customer's site.
The ASSEMBLER main program could call a dummy COBOL main,
which does nothing (but builds the LE environment) and calls again the
ASSEMBLER main at a secondary en
I am not sure the process. I'd advise adding more secondary PPTS datasets.
SMP/E remembers which PPTS a given PTF is in.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:34 PM
> To:
Yes, they can. Done this some times before.
Regards, Lucas
On Mar 16, 2017 21:32, "Herring, Bobby" wrote:
> I am in the process of receiving a large RSU maintenance order. I have
> filled up three SMPPTS datasets that were not defined large enough.
>
> Can these be merged and consolidated into
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 <
peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote:
> Doesn't use of (add_entry) presume that you add to the table BEFORE you
> call (init_subr) or (init_subr_dp)? What if initialization is set up to be
> done first, before any entries at all appear in the
YES
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Herring, Bobby
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Can SMPPTS datasets be consolidated?
I am in the process of receiving a large RSU maintena
I am in the process of receiving a large RSU maintenance order. I have filled
up three SMPPTS datasets that were not defined large enough.
Can these be merged and consolidated into one or two much larger datasets?
Bobby Herring
Texas Farm Bureau Ins.
[http://www.txfb-ins.com/TFBICImages/email.jp
Hello list!
Is there anything I can do with a backup of a logstream's offload datasets if,
for example, the logstream itself got deleted? I can redefine the logstream,
but is there any way to restore a logstream's data? If I restore the offload
datasets they will just be seen as orphaned datase
Doesn't use of (add_entry) presume that you add to the table BEFORE you call
(init_subr) or (init_subr_dp)? What if initialization is set up to be done
first, before any entries at all appear in the table?
Can initialization happen with a "dummy" LE-enabled subroutine in the table and
then cal
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 <
peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote:
> I thought I might need to use stert_seq and end_seq too. Thanks for the
> advice.
>
> However, I am running into a little roadblock at the moment. I set things
> up copying some of the sample program AS
I thought I might need to use stert_seq and end_seq too. Thanks for the advice.
However, I am running into a little roadblock at the moment. I set things up
copying some of the sample program ASMPIPI listed in the LE Pgmrs Guide, but
without any fixed program name in the ceexptbl entry since t
You have an Assembler program, and once it has called and returned from one
COBOL program, it goes on to call and return from other COBOL programs (or
other invocations of the same program)?
You'll want to look at start_seq and end_seq.
--
You are talking about a debugger (IBM Debug Tool, for example). I am asking
about a "unit testing framework". Two different things, both supported under
the higher level "Developer" tool.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve Beaver
Sent: W
Hi All,
We are preparing for the transition from COBOL V4.2 to COBOL V5.2. Existing
non-LE-enabled assembler main programs need to change from using IGZERRE
initialization to using CEEPIPI enclave initialization to allow calling
multiple COBOL subroutines, sometimes calling a subroutine more t
You shouldn't have to stop them (the CEC's themselves) as long as you can get
all the timing links active first. Any LPARs that want to join the sysplexes
will need re-ipled if the timesource changes.
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:45:30 +0300, Mohamed Gomaa wrote:
>Hi Dana,
>Do I have to stop the t
Hi Dana,
Do I have to stop the two CECs first before do the change.
Mohamed
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
>
> Mohamed,
>
> You will have to change the CTN on the DR CEC and the TEST CEC to PRODSTP.
> Then I think all LPARs on those two CECs will n
Mohamed,
You will have to change the CTN on the DR CEC and the TEST CEC to PRODSTP.
Then I think all LPARs on those two CECs will need to be IPLed to be aware of
the new time source. It's been a while since we've change any of our STP
configuration.
Dana
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:20:07 +,
What problem are you trying to solve by using PARTREL?
Or are you just looking for code samples on how it works?
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of PINION, RICHARD W.
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 7:52 A
I have a Java Webserver started task and for each client I'm creating a
LogonContext using JAAS. This works fine using a userid and password, but I
would like to use a userid and passticket. To use passtickets I need to specify
the application id. How do I tell JAAS or the started task to use a
W dniu 2017-03-16 o 10:34, Timothy Sipples pisze:
A few years ago (2013) Linux started supporting "raw-track access mode" to
ECKD DASD, beginning with Linux kernel Version 3.11. Eberhard Pasch briefly
describes raw-track access mode here:
http://linuxmain.blogspot.sg/2013/11/raw-eckd-access-from
Does anybody have a program that uses the PARTREL function?
FIRST TENNESSEE
Confidentiality notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or
the employee or agent responsible for
Hi Folks
I am grateful for all of your help & input
I am in the midst of a family crisis,. so my responses, and or, implementation
may come at a slower pace.
David Larry, Kool systems programmer at large
--
For IBM-MAIN subs
A reminder that the next Hillgang will be held 22 March at the CA office
in Herndon.
We will have -
- Barton from Velocity software
- CA
- Me talking Docker and OpenShift on z
The full agenda and registration details available at
http://www.vm.ibm.com/events/HILL0317.PDF
Neale
-
On 3/16/2017 2:30 AM, kalda0...@gmail.com wrote:
> When I try to format the trace in IPCS the following error is received:
>
> BLS21082I DSNAME('SYS1.TRACE')I/O error
> BLS21081I 0AB1,D,SYS00010,READ,OUT OF EXTENT,TTR UNKNOWN,BSAM
> AHL10004I Input is not a GTF trace dataset.
> AHL10009I No re
A few years ago (2013) Linux started supporting "raw-track access mode" to
ECKD DASD, beginning with Linux kernel Version 3.11. Eberhard Pasch briefly
describes raw-track access mode here:
http://linuxmain.blogspot.sg/2013/11/raw-eckd-access-from-zlinux.html
I'm wondering if anybody uses raw-trac
I have written something similar to this for a customer of mine,
which tested arbitrary routines (PL/1, ASSEMBLER, C). The interfaces of
the routines had to be defined to the system, and then the system could
run thousands of testcases, stored on PO members (optionally on DB2),
and compare the res
35 matches
Mail list logo
