Re: IBM customer anchor

With the NAME/TOKEN, it would be pretty hard to accidentally use the same token name (assuming you give your token a non-generic name). For ours they all start with "Syzygy_somthing" or "Syz_somethingelse" and since you have 16 bytes to play with you would have to try pretty hard to

Re: Searching PMR

I think if you are part of the shop that opened the PMR you can see it. If it is not for your shop, you cannot see it. You use www.ibm.com/ibmlinkselect Service Request link to look for your shops PMR. You can search by software request number or IBM Customer number. Lizette >

Searching PMR

Hi Is it possible to search PMR number opened by others. This is to check the status and see if the PMR is resolved Apology this might dummy but I am logged not able to see. Could someone please help me with the correct URL ? Regards Nathan

Re: FW: common storage usage question

For an SQA request which needs to convert some multiple of 4K pages from CSA to SQA, the path length is longer. As to the question of whether or not it is dramatic, the answer is the same as for most performance questions - "it depends". One could construct an artificial workload where

Re: EBCDIC, ASCII, ugh

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Does this do anytning that couldn't as well be done with: > cp "//'KIRK.CLEARTEXT.DATA'" /dev/fd/1 | > iconv -f IBM-037 -t IBM-1252 | > gpg -r key-1 --batch --output=-

Re: EBCDIC, ASCII, ugh

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:20:29 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote: >Since you kindly mentioned "fromdsn", I'll plug that a nice option would be >to use Co:Z Hybrid batch to offload the encryption as part of transfer >(without any unencrypted data at rest). > >Here's a slight variation of the example from our

Re: Windows 10 Pro automatic update

[Default] On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:47:36 -0500, Norbert Friemel wrote: >On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:40:47 -0300, Clark Morris wrote: > >>I don't recall if I updated to the Creator's edition but I have kept >>fairly up to date on all my computers. Windows 10 itself has not >>caused

Re: IEAMSCHD no FRR param

On 6/23/2017 11:37 AM, contactmura...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for the response. But while testing it is observed that if we execute FRR with a debugger then it doesn't work as expected. Mostly because the debugger places its own FRR in the FRR stack. That sounds like a concern to take up

Re: Windows 10 Pro automatic update: was Re: Eliminating the systems programmer was Re: IBM cuts contractor billing by 15 percent (our else)

To set a metered connection in Windows 10 and stop the automatic updates: Select Start Windows logo Start button > Settings Gear-shaped Settings icon > Network & Internet > Wi-Fi Expanding curves Wi-Fi icon > Manage known networks. 2 Select the Wi-Fi network > Properties > turn on Set as

Re: EBCDIC, ASCII, ugh

Frank, It's kind of a difficult thing to explain what's going on with "z/OS Hyrid Batch", but this 10 minute youtube video should help: https://www.youtube.com/embed/WlZbN_vs7us Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies http://dovetail.com On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Frank Swarbrick <

Re: EBCDIC, ASCII, ugh

Interesting. But in this case it's a transfer to a remote (non-z/OS) platform, so I don't think that would work. Frank From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Cieri, Anthony Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 7:44

Re: Windows 10 Pro automatic update: was Re: Eliminating the systems programmer was Re: IBM cuts contractor billing by 15 percent (our else)

There was an option somewhere to turn the updates off altogether - I don't remember right now but will check it when I get home and will let you know tomorrow. These updates were driving me crazy - I was even trying to blame the problem on Walmart since I bought the discounted refurbished

Re: Windows 10 Pro automatic update: was Re: Eliminating the systems programmer was Re: IBM cuts contractor billing by 15 percent (our else)

[Default] On 26 Jun 2017 08:45:34 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov (Barkow, Eileen) wrote: >I thought that the Windows 10 Update problems were due to something in the way >that Windows 10 had been mis-installed or upgraded from Windows 7 on my >refurbished computer. >It

Re: EBCDIC, ASCII, ugh

Please ignore my previous post; my mailer let it loose while I was editing it :-) Let me try again: You could use Co:Z Hybrid batch to offload the encryption as part of transfer (without any unencrypted data at rest). Here's a slight variation of the example from our cookbook:

Re: EBCDIC, ASCII, ugh

Since you kindly mentioned "fromdsn", I'll plug that a nice option would be to use Co:Z Hybrid batch to offload the encryption as part of transfer (without any unencrypted data at rest). Here's a slight variation of the example from our cookbook: https://dovetail.com/docs/coz/cookbook.html#4_3

Re: Windows 10 Pro automatic update: was Re: Eliminating the systems programmer was Re: IBM cuts contractor billing by 15 percent (our else)

I thought that the Windows 10 Update problems were due to something in the way that Windows 10 had been mis-installed or upgraded from Windows 7 on my refurbished computer. It would just update and update and then claim that the updates could not be completed for some reason. After researching

Re: EBCDIC, ASCII, ugh

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:54:35 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: > > > >However, if you still have tape, you can write the file from > >EBCDIC to tape (where conversion will be done by I/O

Re: EBCDIC, ASCII, ugh

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:54:35 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: > >However, if you still have tape, you can write the file from >EBCDIC to tape (where conversion will be done by I/O routines) in >ASCII. Once that is done, you can write to DASD with NO >Conversion, and then compress it and do the MD5

Re: IBM customer anchor

>What precludes collisions of name/tokens? >Simply bigger name space? Nothing precludes collisions of anything. This is one big sometimes-happy family among IBM, ISVs, and customers and I think that those who play by the rules tend to be happiest. This is why it has always been recommended

Re: EBCDIC, ASCII, ugh

On 06/23/2017 07:54 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote: It must be encrypted such that when decrypted on an ASCII platform (or any platform, really) it will be in ASCII. Not sure on the line separator requirement, but I will find out. Your comment about TLS ensuring the data is not altered in

FW: common storage usage question

My 2003 Newsletter has this note: 29. APAR OW54622 introduced an SQA overflow into CSA condition that increased CPU time for many STCs over time; the new GETMAIN larger than FREEMAIN was corrected by APAR OW55360. It has long been known that when SQA is too small and expands into the

Re: common storage usage question

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Pommier, Rex > Sent: 20 June, 2017 16:12 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: common storage usage question > > Hi all, > > Curiosity question. Due to some storage issues