AW: Re: Would SHARE kindly kick IBM in the ass for what the've done with their web content?

Hello Harry,thank you very much for you response, and especially for picking this up. I know the subject I chose was a bit harshly formulated, but I did this on purpose. I was hoping that it would get things going, and it did. I'm grateful. Best regardsPeter -- Peter Hunkeler

AW: z/OS Internet Library Broken (again)

ROTFLOL. This is ridiculous, IBM! Case b) below is an intra-page reference; they don't get even this most basic of HTML right. -- Peter Hunkeler >b) Redisplays the same page: >https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosv2r2-pdf-download?OpenDocument#DGW

Re: Would SHARE kindly kick IBM in the ass for what the've done with their web content?

Dear Peter I apologize for not responding sooner to your plea for help, but I do want to publicly respond on behalf of SHARE. SHARE is a community of people representing users of enterprise technology. As such, we regularly participate in discussions with various vendors in the Z ecosystem

Re: z/OS Internet Library Broken (again)

I ran into an issue this weekend looking for a z/OS 2.2 manual. What happened was when I selected a link to a 2.2 manual I got a 2.1 manual. With some hunting I was able to find the 2.2 version of the manual. I reported this issue to the "feedback" link over the weekend. When I was asked

z/OS Internet Library Broken (again)

This seems to be an exact duplicate of the problem repaired a couple of weeks ago! https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosInternetLibrary?OpenDocument Select "Download Books in PDF Format" for z/OS 2.2. Displays URL below:

Re: Two new RFE's to consider supporting

Mouse selection exists. Configure your mouse to send CUR SEL, which emulates a light-pen press. The panel needs to make the field light-pen/CUR SEL compatible. We did this in the early 80s, writing an in-house emulator, before emulators were available. OREXXMan JCL is the buggy whip of 21st

Re: IOEZ00793E Error=111 reason=EF016015 received while attempting to convert directory / to version 5 format

zFS Thu Jan 26 14:45:58 EST 2017 Description: SAF CKACC returned error. Action: The user did not have the correct permission on

Re: IOEZ00793E Error=111 reason=EF016015 received while attempting to convert directory / to version 5 format

On 6/27/2018 12:01 PM, Jantje. wrote: Dear Listers, Can anyone please point me to some documentation where the error code and/or reason code for the above error message is? I am converting directories in a zFS to version 1.5 and for some directories this is not working. I get the above error

IOEZ00793E Error=111 reason=EF016015 received while attempting to convert directory / to version 5 format

Dear Listers, Can anyone please point me to some documentation where the error code and/or reason code for the above error message is? I am converting directories in a zFS to version 1.5 and for some directories this is not working. I get the above error message, but the manual says only:

Re: ICSF and millions of RSA keys

If you have the ability, I'd open a Q PMR with IBM crypto support. I suspect it can handle it, but doesn't hurt to ask. For crypto, years ago we were running into catalog contention with ICSF accessing the KDS datasets. We created new dedicated usercat/alias and have been fine ever since.

ICSF and millions of RSA keys

Usually ICSF use the key kept in its repositories - CKDS for symmetric keys and PKDS for assymetric cryptography. There is a plan to use several millions of public keys (private key reside out of the mainframe). Some questions and doubts: 1. Is it good idea to have millions of keys in PKDS?

Re: Eternal WAIT on un-waited ECB

You would not use pause/release for its individual-call performance characteristics, but for other things. For example, pause/release is not subject to the cross-memory post case where the interface's being an "ASCB address" leaves things subject to question if the target terminates and then a