Hi all,
I'm still alive and working. Just 54 years old so not retired. I just don't
follow the ibm-main listserver so much.
Feel free to contact me directly.
For Cobol V5 and higher you should use the DD //MAINONLY to avoid S0C4 for
staticly binded programs.
Peter contact me and I'll check
I would like operator console to be notified when any address space or Job
taking more CPU for longer then any time we specify
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:27 AM, retired mainframer wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> > Of Peter Hunkeler
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Peter Hunkeler
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 10:10 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: AW: Re: CPU Utilization
>
> >No, IEFUTL is called INSIDE an Address Space as often as specified in
SMFPRMxx in
>
Thanks for reply. We don't have BMC Mainview or IBM Omegamon or any third
party product except Netview from ibm.
I read about RMFM3B from rmf user guide also but not much help to setup
this for CPU usage . Can anybody help me to achieve this task .
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Feller,
Thanks
Instead of adding a whole TargetServer section, you only have to another
TargetIP statement.
CSSMTP can connect to up to 4 target servers.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 4:46 PM
To:
>No, IEFUTL is called INSIDE an Address Space as often as specified in SMFPRMxx
>in statement JWT.
and it would also be called when the CPU time used exceeds the time limit
of the job or step (TIME= parameter). But this means also that the exit is most
never called.
And since we're at
David W Noon wrote:
>Some of my old work-mates went: EDS==>HP==>out-the-door.
No doubt! As did a lot of other folks.
>A lot of the old EDS mainframers were made redundant because HP felt the
>mainframe was dead. The mainframe now helps to keep HPE alive.
How's that? HPE NonStop isn't
Depending on your windows for IPL
My favorite way is to
1) Add the new MOD54 and DRAIN the MOD9
2) IPL the system so that any STC/TSU are moved to the MOD54
3) Purge/route/OFFLOAD the remaining output on the MOD9
All done
I have not found the $MSPL as friendly as I would like.
You are a genius it worked I don’t understand why
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Binyamin Dissen
> wrote:
>
> Not true - only if you are doing an OFF for the current breakpoint.
>
> Try my example.
>
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:31:40 -0400 Joseph Reichman
> wrote:
>
> :>anytime I do an OFF
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 17:56:08 -0400, Phil Smith Iii (li...@akphs.com)
wrote about "Re: SUSE splits from Microfocus" (in
<007801d41318$a68872d0$f3995870$@akphs.com>):
> So some folks went: HP==>HPE==>DXC; some went HP==>HPE==>Micro Focus; some
> went just HP==>HPE; and some even stayed as HP the
And don’t be confused by HP on the American stock market. That’s Helmerich and
Payne, an oil services company. Hewlett-Packard is HPQ.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, July 3, 2018, 5:56 PM, Phil Smith III wrote:
OK, kids, pay attention, because this will be on the exam.
In
Phil Smith III wrote:
OK, kids, pay attention, because this will be on the exam.
In the beginning, there was Hewlett-Packard, or HP. And HP was formless and
huge, and darkness was upon the stock.
You didn't start with oscillators? :) That reminds me, I need to grab my
dad's old one which is
Phil Smith III wrote:
>OK, kids, pay attention, because this will be on the exam.
{ lots of "thingamajig things" snipped }
Urgh! I (as a kid) can't pay attention to what you wrote, but will not blame
you of course. ;-)
I will just STFU and monitor IBM-MAIN and other news reels for more
Love it!
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 5:56 PM Phil Smith III wrote:
> OK, kids, pay attention, because this will be on the exam.
>
>
>
> In the beginning, there was Hewlett-Packard, or HP. And HP was formless and
> huge, and darkness was upon the stock.
>
>
>
> And the Board made a decision: split the
OK, kids, pay attention, because this will be on the exam.
In the beginning, there was Hewlett-Packard, or HP. And HP was formless and
huge, and darkness was upon the stock.
And the Board made a decision: split the company! And thus was born Hewlett
Packard Enterprise (HPE)-no hyphen, and
Okay thanks soon as I get home thanks
Joe Reichman
170-10 73 rd ave
Fresh meadows NY 11366
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Binyamin Dissen
> wrote:
>
> Not true - only if you are doing an OFF for the current breakpoint.
>
> Try my example.
>
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:31:40 -0400 Joseph
You are partly correct and I am totally wrong. Micro Focus bought *a bunch of
products* (ArcSight; Voltage, the home of our own Phil Smith III) from HPE. HPE
continues to be alive and well. https://www.hpe.com/us/en/home.html
CSC mashed up with the HPE services business, formerly known as EDS,
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:39:40 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>PARSE SOURCE on VSE returns:
>VSE COMMAND TESTREXX PROC IPLLIB.VSE2PDF1.TESTREXX.PROC
>TESTREXX VSE VSE ?
>
So it would be practical to multipath for compatibility.
>VSE does not have pipelines.
>
z/OS barely has Pipelines. An obsolete
We are planning to convert mod-9 spool volume to mod-54spool volume, both
the volumes are online and now it’s in use.
I need to copy the data from mod-9 to mod-54 and then drain the mod9 volume
and return back to storage.
Can I go with $MSPL command or any other better way to do without IPL,
Hi Barry,
Thanks for the detailed reply. I understand a bit more about the structure
now. I may be able to examine the ER data to get the information instead of
scanning the class table, but if the ED table entry physically precedes the ER
entry it may be tricky to coordinate within the
Not true - only if you are doing an OFF for the current breakpoint.
Try my example.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:31:40 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>anytime I do an OFF subcommand all other subcommand dont execute
:>
:>
:>
:>
:>
:>> On Jul 3, 2018, at 2:46 PM, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
:>>
:>> As
> Hi,
>
> We are planning to convert mod-9 spool volume to mod-54spool volume, both
> the volumes are online and use now.
> I need to copy the data from mod-9 to mod-54 and then drain the mod9
> volume and return back to storage.
> Can I go with $MSPL command or any better way to do without IPL,
:
> Hi,
>
> We are planning to convert mod-9 spool volume to mod-54spool volume, both
> the volumes are online and use now.
> I need to copy the data from mod-9 to mod-54 and then drain the mod9
> volume and return back to storage.
> Can I go with $MSPL command or any better way to do without
PARSE SOURCE on VSE returns:
VSE COMMAND TESTREXX PROC IPLLIB.VSE2PDF1.TESTREXX.PROC
TESTREXX VSE VSE ?
VSE does not have pipelines.
Tony Thigpen
Paul Gilmartin wrote on 07/03/2018 03:17 PM:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:25:40 -0400, Hobart Spitz wrote:
This probably doesn't need to be said, but
anytime I do an OFF subcommand all other subcommand don’t execute
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 2:46 PM, Binyamin Dissen
> wrote:
>
> As I wrote, the RETURN breakpoint has to turn off the original breakpoint
> before the GO. Also, I suggested
>
> "To do what you want is to have a piece of code
HPE ?
That’s odd I thought HPE merged with CSC and became DXC ??
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 2:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SUSE splits from Microfocus
If you have BMC Mainview or IBM Omegamon (or some other monitoring software)
consider looking at those to monitor and alert you about CPU usage. Among
other things that is part of what they are created for.
Thanks..
Paul Feller
AGT Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From:
This sounds like something that could be done with a product like BMC Mainview
for z/OS or ASG TMON for z/OS (or other). I think alerts can be set for CPU
usage in these products.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:25:40 -0400, Hobart Spitz wrote:
>This probably doesn't need to be said, but all(/most?) Access Method
>Services (IDCAMS) commands are TSO commands.
>
>Under TSO, it's enough to write:
> ...
>call outtrap "CmdOut."
>"listcat cluster"
>call outtrap "off"
>
Hi Peter,
In the description of the fields of the ESD entry buffer format it shows:
3 ESD_ELEM_OFFSET Binary 72 4 Offset within class element (LD, ER)
2 ESD_CLASS_OFFSET Binary 76 4 Offset within class segment (ED, LD, PD, ER)
The parenthetical information means these fields apply to only
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:42:21 +0300, saurabh khandelwal
wrote:
>Hello Group,
>
>We have requirement to trigger alert to operator console, once CPU
>utilization for any address space or any Job or any running STC reach to
>certain pre defined number. Like any job or address space or STC consuming
As I wrote, the RETURN breakpoint has to turn off the original breakpoint
before the GO. Also, I suggested
"To do what you want is to have a piece of code that will not be re executed
(such as the entry logic and you will need multiple breakpoints)."
For example
AT +8 (AT +0 (OFF +8;GO +8);
Binyamin
You are right so here is the code
089065 6080 STMR6,R5,SAVEREGS
0C5870 BA3C L R7,SAVE7
In the clist
GETMAIN 10 SP(0) LOC (BELOW) EQUATE (PARM1)
GETMAIN 16 SP(0) LOC (BELOW)
saurabh khandelwal wrote:
>Can IEFUTL exit also provide live CPU usage detail by every job, stc, address
>space, omvs etc and send alert to operator console, if any set limit for CPU
>is exceeded .
No, IEFUTL is called INSIDE an Address Space as often as specified in SMFPRMxx
in statement JWT
True.
Never have used a CALL in a breakpoint and OFF was always the last in the
list.
To do what you want is to have a piece of code that will not be re executed
(such as the entry logic and you will need multiple breakpoints).
at BKP1 (call whatever return(BKP2))
at BKP2 (off BKP1;go BKP1)
If
What trouble is MicroFocus in?
BTW, you know they did not buy HP? HP is alive and NYSE-listed. They bought HPE
which was by then a totally different company.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rob Schramm
I read about RMFM3B from below white paper
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/c6192fb3a432612485256d970082de57/399938068ea32df786256e2a005e8c8e/$FILE/RMF_WTO_2010.pdf
but i am not sure, how to implement this for checking live cpu usage for
every stc, jes job , omvs etc and
Hello,
Thanks for reply. Can IEFUTL exit also provide live CPU usage detail by
every job, stc, address space, omvs etc and send alert to operator console,
if any set limit for CPU is exceeded .
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 6:53 PM, retired mainframer wrote:
> You might look at IEFUTL in the MVS
There used to be a site that had caricatures of SHARE folk, but I can't find
it. This is from SHARE blog in Seattle.
https://www.share.org/p/bl/et/blogaid=341
In a message dated 7/3/2018 7:46:55 AM Central Standard Time,
rpomm...@sfgmembers.com writes:
I dunno, can't be age. I've seen
While I know that it will not be possible to port the code, I mainly am
concerned with source level close-compatibility.
For example, LINK or LINKPGM can be different under the covers to
support a z/OS parm list. (I am not sure that there is a difference, but
am taking your word on it.)
Nuts, I was answering this, thinking I had the latest to find out
I did not.
The parser used by C:D for z/OS has some issues. This is probably
a doc error. I'm afraid that the GDG has to be done enclosed with
apostrophes.
But, contact support (whoever actually had this problem) and
point
This probably doesn't need to be said, but all(/most?) Access Method
Services (IDCAMS) commands are TSO commands.
Under TSO, it's enough to write:
...
call outtrap "CmdOut."
"listcat cluster"
call outtrap "off"
...
or
...
"pipe listcat | stem CmdOut."
...
In
Binyamin
This is from 1.9 book I don't think things have changed
"Note: If an OFF subcommand in the list removes the breakpoint for which a
list is specified, all remaining subcommands in that list are ignored".
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Wow, this doc is not formatted the way it used to be.
When one does a copy, one can send the data or one can pull the
data. Let us assume that the system that starts the process is
the one in control (Process control *AND* PNODE), and that one is
going to copy *from* the PNODE to the SNODE
On 2 July 2018 at 19:37, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>> On Jul 2, 2018, at 4:31 PM, Binyamin Dissen
>> wrote:
>>
>> If I understand you correctly and you repetitively want this to occur, you
>> will need:
>>
>> AT +8 (AT +C (off +c;call ..;go);go)
> Didn’t know you can put in parens to force
On 7/3/2018 9:11 AM, willie bunter wrote:
Hallo To All,
Just curious. I just noticed the following when I do a LISTCAT via ISPF 3.4
ENCRYPTIONDATA DATA SET ENCRYPTION-(NO)
Was it always there? If not would anybody know when it began to appear? We
are running
Pervasive .. ;-)
בתאריך יום ג׳, 3 ביולי 2018, 19:11, מאת willie bunter <
001409bd2345-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>:
> Hallo To All,
> Just curious. I just noticed the following when I do a LISTCAT via ISPF
> 3.4
> ENCRYPTIONDATA DATA SET ENCRYPTION-(NO)
>
On 2018-07-03, at 08:58:26, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> *PLEASE* don't re-invent the wheel. z/VSE has had this for 15+ years. We have
> had time to shake out the issues.
>
Yes, but would it be feasible to port these to z/OS? Something like
the enhancements to DYNALLOC that Shmuel discusses. It
That has not been my experience. Doing OFF in the breakpoint does not cause an
automatic GO
My guess is that you did not form the statement correctly or that it is
possible to get to +C without going thru +8.
It is always best to show your commands and the responses, rather than telling
us what
Hallo To All,
Just curious. I just noticed the following when I do a LISTCAT via ISPF 3.4
ENCRYPTIONDATA DATA SET ENCRYPTION-(NO)
Was it always there? If not would anybody know when it began to appear? We
are running RELEASE z/OS 02.02.00
Thanks.
You might look at IEFUTL in the MVS Installation Exits manual to see if it can
do what you want.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of saurabh khandelwal
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 4:42 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: CPU Utilization
*PLEASE* don't re-invent the wheel. z/VSE has had this for 15+ years. We
have had time to shake out the issues.
parm_value = ’this is a parameter string’
ADDRESS LINK ’TESTMODA’ parm_value
or
ADDRESS LINKPGM "PROGRAM p1 p2 ... pn"
We also have ways to provide SYSIN and capture SYSLST:
CALL
Hi,
We are planning to convert mod-9 spool volume to mod-54spool volume, both
the volumes are online and use now.
I need to copy the data from mod-9 to mod-54 and then drain the mod9 volume
and return back to storage.
Can I go with $MSPL command or any better way to do without IPL, please
share
Agreed - the only thing that would be challenging is remembering that instead
of executing the program at the top of the allocations that in REXX the
allocations must come first.
--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor) <
Mainframe
Making the wee joke. Ha ha.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 7:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Formatting (was: JCL ERROR : IGD01022I)
The Enya is
And all of those are relatively simple "atomic" changes with few if any
negatives, and "goodness" that transcends JCL replacement.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018
When you reinvent the wheel, please make them round. A procedural replacement
for JCL has all sorts of issues, regardless of syntax. Instead, why not
1. Enhance Dynalloc to have a parallel allocation function.
2. Enhance IRXJCL to allow a script in a sequential dataset.
3. Enhance REXX to
Is there an "RFC compliant" profile option for LISTSERV? Is that 9A regardless
of charset? WTF is 9A in the charset it used? Was this an individual e-mail or
digest?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
Hello listers,
>From your experiences, what are the options available for identifying
>active/meh/cold VOLSER/tape volume.
What are the kind of reports and fields that are worth reporting on.
As always, thanks for sharing your experiences!
- Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
The Enya is perfectly valid in ISO-1 and ISO-15. Would you rather he wrote it
as sennor?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 6:24 PM
To:
If you have the ability to save the actual message to a file and you send it to
me as an attachment, I should be able to tell whether the message is malformed
or the receiving e-mail client is mangling it. Make sure that your client
doesn't change the message as it stores it, e.g., by removing
It would help to show what you have done and any messages you have concerns
about.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Gadi Ben-Avi
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 6:19 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: CSSMTP question
>
> Hi,
> I
Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
>I am setting up CSSMTP for the first time.
>Our mail system has two gateways I can use.
>Is there a way to define two TargetServers in the CSSMTP configuration?
You can. Look at (yes, for now this URL is 2.1)
Hi,
I am setting up CSSMTP for the first time.
Our mail system has two gateways I can use.
Is there a way to define two TargetServers in the CSSMTP configuration?
I am using z/OS v2.2
Thanks
Gadi
? ?? ? ?? ??? ??? ?? ? ??? ??
??. ?? ,
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:42:21 +0300, saurabh khandelwal
wrote:
>Hello Group,
>
>We have requirement to trigger alert to operator console, once CPU
>utilization for any address space or any Job or any running STC reach to
>certain pre defined number. Like any job or address space or STC consuming
I agree. However, I think the need to sell SUSE has everything to do with
the trouble Microfocus is in since the HP acquisition.
Rob Schramm
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:18 PM Charles Mills wrote:
> A good deal for MicroFocus. They bought the whole dang thing of Attachmate
> for $1.2B. They just
I dunno, can't be age. I've seen pictures of you. Don't look like you could
be a year over 35!!
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 3:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
The quotes had to be around the GDG DSN in the VOL=(,RETAIN,REF='gdg.dsn(0)')
Go figure - hoping they take an apar on that as the syntax error message was
totally worthless.
I also found a RESGDG keyword but could not find any explanation of what it
does?
Another Question: Is there a way to
Dyck, Lionel B. wrote:
>The problem was the TO was a GDG and the dsn needed to be in quotes :-)
In quotes? It is not documented in the C:D manuals (at naming conventions and
syntax diagram for VOL=) or I missed that somewhere. Where dsn (lowercase) is
documented, no mentioning of quotes are
Binyamin
The off for +C killed the call as the book says
Off for an at in the list kills the remaining
Subcommand
> On Jul 2, 2018, at 4:31 PM, Binyamin Dissen
> wrote:
>
> If I understand you correctly and you repetitively want this to occur, you
> will need:
>
> AT +8 (AT +C (off
Hello Group,
We have requirement to trigger alert to operator console, once CPU
utilization for any address space or any Job or any running STC reach to
certain pre defined number. Like any job or address space or STC consuming
CPU for more then 30 min etc , operator should get alter on his
The problem was the TO was a GDG and the dsn needed to be in quotes :-)
thx
--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor) <
Mainframe Systems Programmer - RavenTek Solution Partners
-Original Message-
From: Gibson, Jamie
72 matches
Mail list logo
