MK Kwan asked:
>Does async duplexing of Lock structures help on improving
>the response?
Yes, it should, but how much is workload dependent. There's a performance
guide involving some SAP-related workloads available here:
https://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP102720
No sane person would seriously advocate the "demise" of JCL. All the
slings & arrows it's suffered here lately are just the motivation for
trying alternatives; or for some proposed enhancements. The continued
existence and use of JCL (moot anyway) is no impediment to the alternatives.
sas
I didn't notice branch entry WTO when it came out. It still needs an RB, but
apparently that is in the RCT.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Tony Harminc
Sent: Friday, July 13,
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:30:37 +, Robert Prins wrote:
>On 2018-07-13 01:29, CM Poncelet wrote:
> > What 'problem' with JCL is fixed by replacing it with REXX?
>
>REXX doesn't have a limit of 255 steps in a job, and that limit may be reached
>when doing regression tests. It also allows loops.
On 2018-07-13 01:29, CM Poncelet wrote:
> What 'problem' with JCL is fixed by replacing it with REXX?
REXX doesn't have a limit of 255 steps in a job, and that limit may be reached
when doing regression tests. It also allows loops. Example I have is too long to
post here (probably).
Robert
