On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 22:33:19 -0500, Ze'ev Atlas wrote:
>Thank you Gil
>You have confirmed what I suspected since I've seen the code. The developer
>has introduced a non-standard code that is compatible only with GNU make. I
>have already complained about the issue as introduction of non-standa
Hi
Apology for the dummy query.
After TPCR, this is is the first I am looking at IBM Copy services .
Now we are in metro mirroring . Under IBM Copy services which option is
that on which performs the breaking of replication and re-establishes the
replication.
I am going through each options ses
Thank you Gil
You have confirmed what I suspected since I've seen the code. The developer
has introduced a non-standard code that is compatible only with GNU make. I
have already complained about the issue as introduction of non-standard code
would definitely hamper any port to a non 'make' en
Yes, we have the cloud before if was “popular”, it was called a Service
Bureau, which did your work and charged appropriately.
Now part of it is diy and your charged more.
Scott
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 4:04 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> cloud = timesharing
>
> Someone else deploys the infrastruct
Yes, ISPF stats are in the user half-words of the directory.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 12:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.e
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 10:39:20 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>Otherwise I guess you need the classic solution with some character legal in C
>macro names:
>
>#ifdef __MVS__
> #define MACRONAME __macroname__
>#else
> #define MACRONAME @macroname@
>#endif
>
>Looks to me like @ is legal in s
Be careful; spammers often forge headers, so it's safest to learn how to read
headers and to check the Received header fields to determine the actual
provenance of the spam.
See also http://www.medwayhosting.com/spam-l/deobfuscation-by-Shmuel/index.html
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason
That depends. Best practice is to use unique names for the page datasets in
IEASYSxx PAGE=, in which case they don't present a conflicts. You can even
have identical IEASYSxx members if you use static system symbols to generate
names specific to the LPAR.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://ma
cloud = timesharing
Someone else deploys the infrastructure, to you it's a black box. Less control
but also less manpower. Some legal issues.
No, z/OS is not a cloud, but neither is AIX, *bsd, Linux, windows or Solaris;
it's the deployment that makes it a cloud or not a cloud. You can have a cl
Otherwise I guess you need the classic solution with some character legal in C
macro names:
#ifdef __MVS__
#define MACRONAME __macroname__
#else
#define MACRONAME @macroname@
#endif
Looks to me like @ is legal in symbol names, but I could easily be wrong.
Charles
-Original
I did
DEF(@macroname@=1)
and it seems not to work. i.e.
#define MACRONAME @macroname@
#if MACRONAME
...
#else
...
#endif
did not yield the desired results
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
s
This seems to be a good idea
I will try to do:
DEF(@xxx@=1) and see if it works
As for Gil's question, yeah it is an open source (PCRE2) that is usually dealt
with by gcc and make.
If the idea above worls themn I am done
ZA
--
What exactly is the problem?
Is there some reason you cannot DEF(@macroname@=newvalue) ?
Is @ legal is C macro names? Is there an IBM extension to allow it?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ze'ev Atlas
Sent:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 11:58:14 +, Ze'ev Atlas wrote:
>...
>I have a new challenge, something like:
>#define HAVE_STDINT_H @HAVE_STDINT_H@
>which means that I should not define the macro externally, but get only the
>value from CMake
>
This looks like something to be substituted by a p
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 17:06:53 +0300, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>I do understand it, but it is interesting that same blocks in different
>address spaces maps to same address spaces. It is clear why, it is always
>the same order of build, but still interesting.
Unless it's changed in the past few yea
Unfortunately, this is NOT the case
I do have several cases were a macro is not defined in the source code but
supplied, macro and value by the mechanism:
DEF(MACRONAME=somevalue)
Here I encountered something else (I assume it is a CMake and gcc construct).
The macro is not defined externally,
I think Cloud means two different things on whether cloud is a noun or a verb.
For those describing Cloud as a noun its a place where things are cheap and
there is no infrastructure. Others describe noun as a verb which is about
agility, process and speed. For the most part, when people descr
Charles,
I do understand it, but it is interesting that same blocks in different
address spaces maps to same address spaces. It is clear why, it is always
the same order of build, but still interesting.
ITschak
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 4:49 PM Charles Mills wrote:
> What Bin is saying is that
What Bin is saying is that they might indeed all be at the same address -- but
in different address spaces.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of ITschak Mugzach
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 6:29 AM
To: IBM-MAI
I'm not sure I follow. Is this right?
The macro HAVE_STDINT_H is defined somewhere already in the source code, so
defining it in OPTFILE would cause an error.
However, you want it set to a value that would be supplied from OPTFILE? Is
that right?
Could you DEF(HAVE_STDINT_H_VALUE=1) in OPTFILE
Thanks Dori,
how to get the ID in case of SUB=MSTR?
ITschak
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 4:41 PM Dori Polotsky
wrote:
> ITschak,
>
> For an address space that is not SUB=MSTR, you can examine ASCB -> ASSB ->
> JSAB -> JSABUSID
> I believe all three control blocks should be SP 245 (common).
>
> Good
ITschak,
For an address space that is not SUB=MSTR, you can examine ASCB -> ASSB ->
JSAB -> JSABUSID
I believe all three control blocks should be SP 245 (common).
Good luck,
Dori
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 4:29 PM, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Binyamin,
>
> What surprised me what that all ASXBs has
Binyamin,
What surprised me what that all ASXBs has the same address... So, how can
I get the userid associated with the ASCB?
ITschak
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 4:17 PM Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
> Because the ASXB is in private. You need to use the target memorie's ASID.
>
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 15
Because the ASXB is in private. You need to use the target memorie's ASID.
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 15:46:32 +0300 ITschak Mugzach wrote:
:>Few days ago someone (can't recall the thread) asked about scanning ( ascb
:>chain. I tried to follow ascb ASXB and found that it always point to my
:>aSXB, eve
Few days ago someone (can't recall the thread) asked about scanning ( ascb
chain. I tried to follow ascb ASXB and found that it always point to my
aSXB, even when I take the offset from the chain. Any idea why? and
alternatively, how can I find the userid the ascb is associated with?
ITschak
--
Hi allI am using IBM C compiler via good ol' JCL. I already know how to supply
external macro definitions by supplying://OPTFILE DD DSN=MY.LIB(OPTFILE),...and
an OPTFILE member that contains lines like:DEF(HAVE_STDINT_H)or
evenDEF(HAVE_STDINT_H=1)
I have a new challenge, something like:#define
Munif,
There are ISV products in the market that already today support backup and
recovery of individual z/OS UNIX files within a zFS.
Two examples I am aware of:
- Model9 Backup and Recovery for z/OS - https://model9.io and
https://model9.io/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Model9_Unix_Bank_cas
27 matches
Mail list logo
