Hi all
Could we define a service class in WLM by batch job? Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Jason Cai
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
There are good reasons to advocate that IBM properly consider all the use cases
and needs of the mainframe community but I'm not concerned about confidential
data. Salesforce is already used for case management by many of the largest
companies in the world. [Full disclosure including
Looks like it;
* Greater than 16 Domain support
* – Support to allow a cryptographic coprocessor to be shared across
more than 16 domains, up to
the maximum number of LPARs on the system.
* – This support relies on enhanced firmware available with a minimum
microcode
Can two different LPARs share the same domain (and obviously the same keys), or
do the keys have to be loaded for each LPAR separately, even when they are the
same?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Thanks all. David don’t kill the messager, I take your point.
It’s not my decision on what/how we do it. Don’t get me wrong I appreciate
the ideas from all.
We are replacing a Cobol/Hlasm STC with a Rest api interface. We are at
the data gathering stage.
.
Regards,
Scott
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at
It is available for V2R1 when APAR OA49677 is installed.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
"Charles Mills" wrote on 09/27/2018 01:15:38 PM:
> From: "Charles Mills"
> To: ibm-main@listserv.ua.edu
> Date: 09/27/2018 02:02 PM
> Subject: Re: ECB in
@Peter, can you confirm IEAMSXMP is available for V2R1? It is in the V2R2
doc but not the V2R1 doc.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 9:48 AM
To:
>Is that true for address spaces with non-reusable ASIDs?
The exposure is only partly the ASID. It is also the ASCB. Assume that the
ASCB is freemained at end of address space. And thus that storage could
potentially be reused as an ASCB for a new address space. But that
assumption is not
The word has moved from the street to the office. At SHARE in St. Louis, IBM
ran session 22945 that laid out details of 'the new support experience', AKA
Salesforce. The abstract:
"As IBM evolves its Support experience, you'll see lots of changes and
improvements. In addition to new knowledge,
DFSMShsm doesn't have any documented way to do this, and I haven't found any
undocumented patches either.
DFSMShsm also provides a NORESET option to not reset the DSCI when doing
full-volume dumps. I suspect that this is common across all backup products
for full-volume processing, so that
Thanks Tim, this is good information. I appreciate your contributions to
the community.
I have to say that Liberty might be the most confusing product offering
from IBM *ever* in terms of what versions and license options are available.
A) For instance, there is this:
I'm not sure what you mean specifically by an IPC file. *Exactly* what
kind?
cp works for me for fifos, which are character device files based on Unix
pipes.I would bet that Unix domain sockets work just the same.
If you are using some other kind of IPC that uses a device file (message
OK, I don’t understand this, can someone explain.
I found instructions on running TCPIP packet traces, set up a test job and got
these results:
Running without trace on... I was getting 15 KB/s ... think carrier pigeon
would be quicker.
Turned on trace to see what was going on, and got >4000
PAX may be a better option.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jake Anderson
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 5:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Copying OMVS IPC file
Hi
Cross posted
Good morning
Could
Hi
Cross posted
Good morning
Could someone please help to understand.
What's the syntax to copy a IPC file to another directory ? I don't see it
in a manual. The normal CP or MV doesn't work
All I get is FSUM6258
Regards
Jake
I'll have to try this one.:) I hope it turns out to be not true, but it
actually seems like a logical possibility.
Brian
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:56:46 +0100, Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services)
wrote:
>Classification: Public
>The "platinum" (or ) build says to have a single
>master cat
On 27/09/2018 2:58 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
David Crayford wrote:
There is no free WLP.
Were you aware that Open Liberty is available under the Eclipse Public
License?
https://www.openliberty.io
Very cool. I'll give it a test drive. There's work underway on a spring
boot starter
David Crayford wrote:
>There is no free WLP.
Were you aware that Open Liberty is available under the Eclipse Public
License?
https://www.openliberty.io
Open Liberty was introduced about a year ago now. Yes, Open Liberty is
tested and compatible with z/OS (and with Linux on Z and LinuxONE). The
18 matches
Mail list logo
