[Default] On 13 Nov 2018 15:24:57 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com (Ed Jaffe) wrote:
>On 11/13/2018 2:51 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>> This point was discussed recently. The restriction as stated applies to LPA
>> list. Link list has a number of IBM-supplied PDSE libra
> > From: "Gary Weinhold"
> > Recently we observed that when a task abends, the DCBs/ACBs are already
> > closed when we get control in the RESMGR exit. We know this was not
> > true under z/OS 2.1, but has occurred on our z/OS 2.3 system and at a
> > customer site recently.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:43:30 +0400, Peter wrote:
>Hi
>
>Does anyone has a sample JCL to send Virtual tape file from one lpar to
>other.
>
>Virtual tape are not shared between two lpars.
>
>Peter
>
FTP invocation - batch or otherwise
..login credentials..
mode b
type c
put
You may have so
Brian,
THANK YOU for your generous contribution to the community knowledge base!
Very much appreciated.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Brian Chapman
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 3:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
We've only been here since 6 June 1986. There are various links on CBT and
others. There's over 3500 subscribers. Many developers from IBM and ISVs are
regular participants. Darren has been our keeper the whole time. The google
group is a subscriber but it's not a two way street. Currently the
Thanks Don.
I didn't realize that the listserv even existed. I thought the Google newsgroup
was the primary forum.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with th
It's a catalogued
On Fri 16 Nov, 2018, 11:07 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:43:30 +0400, Peter wrote:
> >
> >Does anyone has a sample JCL to send Virtual tape file from one lpar to
> >other.
> >
> >Virtual tape are not shared bet
is the tape dataset catalog ?
if so nothing special, if you want to send to another lpar to Virtual tape a
LOCSITE or a SITE COMMAND will allow you to specify the UNIT, esoteric or
GENERIC
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Peter"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Frida
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:43:30 +0400, Peter wrote:
>
>Does anyone has a sample JCL to send Virtual tape file from one lpar to
>other.
>
>Virtual tape are not shared between two lpars.
>
Is the "Virtual tape file"
o A catalogued data set?
o Something else (specify)?
-- gil
-
Brian,
This is very generous. Thank you! Many folks here wouldn't see it though as
you sent to the newsgroup rather than the listserv, so I'm passing it on via
this reply.
In article <301b62d5-8e7b-4258-840e-74fdf8f07...@googlegroups.com> you wrote:
> Let me start off by saying that I am a CICS
Hi
Does anyone has a sample JCL to send Virtual tape file from one lpar to
other.
Virtual tape are not shared between two lpars.
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@li
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
The foregoing message (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2521, and is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, do not read it. If you
are not the intended recipient, you a
The whole point of assembler is making it easier for the programmer to code, as
with any other language. Yes, use of macro instructions removes some of the
tight control of the generated machine code, but that is a good thing. I've
programmed in assemblers with no macro facility, and they just
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3321663/data-center/oh-that-smp.html
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1, USNR-Retired
1969-1991
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.ed
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:17:32 -0500 Peter Relson wrote:
:>
:>So where you have a problem with what is generated, turn off IEABRCX.
:>
:>Just curious: do you have an example where IEABRCX resulted in the wrong
:>thing?
I would guess an assembly error when the target address is not in the curren
So where you have a problem with what is generated, turn off IEABRCX.
Just curious: do you have an example where IEABRCX resulted in the wrong
thing?
We tend to use IEABRC/IEABRCX to cover macro invocations, but also do
change our own branches to relative branches (as pointed out, this is
u
The Master the Mainframe team would love you to join them and ask
questions in an upcoming Reddit Ask Me Anything session.
For those unaware, Master the Mainframe’s Learning System is open to
anyone year-round for technology training and earning IBM digital
badges...get free access to a system
On 11/9/2018 8:25 AM, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh wrote:
> So it's just a flag to say it happened?
> Can't find the from and to srvclass info anywhere.. ?
IIRC the RESET command writes its own SMF record (90.3?) that should
have that info. That *should* be in the pub, if it's not certainly
submit a
On 11/9/2018 7:59 AM, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh wrote:
> I guess you could say that it may need consideration when trying to push your
> existing h/w to the limit, much like how WLM is to ration resources out when
> things are running tight.
> – Vignesh
*Any*/every use of velocity needs *on-goin
To be frank, I never considered doing an ATTACH out of a RESMGR.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 17:27:57 -0500 Jim Mulder wrote:
:> This is an intentional change in APAR OA55657.
:>You should see the same results on z/OS 2.1 with PTF UA97322.
:>
:>Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM
20 matches
Mail list logo