Y'all need this -->
https://ahrefs.com/blog/google-advanced-search-operators/
I don't know if all of them work, but I definitely use some of them every day.
- Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: 28 N
Phil Smith III wrote:
>Jack J. Woehr wrote:
>>IND$FILE clearly is short for
>>*I* *N*eed to *D*ownload this *$*#!% *FILE*
>I like it!! We have a winner.
Absolutely. This winner is larger than IGDZILLA ... ;-D
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
---
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
>IND$FILE clearly is short for
>*I* *N*eed to *D*ownload this *$*#!% *FILE*
I like it!! We have a winner.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@l
IND$FILE clearly is short for
*I* *N*eed to *D*ownload this *$*#!% *FILE*
--
Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of
www.well.com/~jax # thinking, a way of skeptically interrogating the universe
www.softwoehr.com # with a fine understanding of human fallibi
Last days of a fairly cordial departure, one leg of a storage controller
failed, 3830 I think. I told them they needed to place a service call. A few
months go by and they call asking if I can get their system back up. Yep, the
other leg had failed I got consulting wages :-)
--
Sigh, blew it at the end. Shoulda charged them through the nose for every
word!
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:03 AM Mark Regan wrote:
> While not mainframe related, maybe some of you have had a similar
> experience, resulting in the same outcome.
>
>
> https://www.computerworld.com/article/3322906/
Anybody have a handle on Sam Lapore?
In a message dated 11/28/2018 7:03:26 PM Central Standard Time,
rogerbo...@gmail.com writes:
Now if somebody has the documentation for that it might explain the name
IND$FILE.
--
For IBM-MAIN
YES! That's what I was trying (and failing) to remember.
Now if somebody has the documentation for that it might explain the name
IND$FILE.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:35 AM Mike Wawiorko <
014ab5cdfb21-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Back to the IBM 3270 PC perhaps.
>
> https://en.wik
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 21:58:01 +, Edward Finnell wrote:
>It's been marked 'Corporate Confidential' for years.
>
What's the license status of IND$FILE?
If it was delivered before IBM licensed software, customers and others
are free to use it anywhre, even Hercules. And IBM has no obligation to
In addition, look in SYS1.SAMPLIB at RACDBULD. It is a DB2 load command
from which it is easy to figure out the data and the columns it is in. Not
at home or I'd have more information.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018, 07:21 Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh <
vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com wrote:
Thanks
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Rob Scott wrote:
>
> Your second sentence seems to suffer from wordwrap issues, however I think
> the answeris "Yes - use LXRES REUSABLE=YES".
>
> It would make sense if the sequence number was stored in the same place you
> store the PC number.
>
> ---
Your second sentence seems to suffer from wordwrap issues, however I think the
answeris "Yes - use LXRES REUSABLE=YES".
It would make sense if the sequence number was stored in the same place you
store the PC number.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
And I would love some sort of regular expression syntax as an option for
complicated searches.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Nightwatch RenBand
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2
was So much for THAT excuse | Computerworld SHARK TANK
I really appreciate this discussion on search engines which I often
find very useful in zOS work. I could not agree more with the need for a
STRICT BOOLEAN type logic at LEAST as an option in search engines. Make it
optional, fine, but m
ISTR there is/was a naming committee. Maybe there's an archive. Bill Neiman in
the ESA roll-out said XCF was the 34th choice.
In a message dated 11/28/2018 11:22:25 AM Central Standard Time,
martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com writes:
Maybe back as far as MYTE.
Logrec is not only preformatted, but it is a wrap around datasets.
So it (LOGREC) always knows where the last record was written in the file.
If it gets to the point of overlaying the data, I think an IFC message is
produced to let you know you are about to lose data.
Lizette
> -Original M
Maybe back as far as MYTE.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
Podca
That was certainly the product that the command was intended to support, but
where did the name come from? The use of a $ in the name was certainly
distinctive.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Back to the IBM 3270 PC perhaps.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_3270_PC
Mike Wawiorko
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: 28 November 2018 16:26
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IND$FILE -- where did the name come from?
Back well before Windows 3. Back to DOS.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Roger Bolan
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 10:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IND$FILE -- where did the name come fr
This is a really vague memory, but I think that the name IND$FILE goes all
the way back, possibly to Windows 3.1. I think the product back then was
PC3270.
--Roger
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018, 7:36 AM Charles Mills There is a link map on that link (hmmm, two different meanings of "link"
> there) that
While not mainframe related, maybe some of you have had a similar
experience, resulting in the same outcome.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3322906/it-careers/that-bus-rolls-both-ways.html
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1, USNR-Retired
1969-1991
--
Seems like not our kind of event. It is close by, between Brock and Sheridan.
John T. Abell
Tel:800-295-7608Option 4
President
International: 1-416-593-5578 Option 4
E-mail: john.ab...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com
Fax:800-295-7609
International: 1-416-593-5579
There is a link map on that link (hmmm, two different meanings of "link"
there) that shows INDx CSECT names, so I think it establishes that IND
is the component prefix.
FILE is pretty obvious, like the COPY in IEBCOPY.
So the only remaining question is "why the dollar sign?" (Or pound sign, f
for a dataset I'm not sure you can tell, almost like CA-ENF DB' its a
preformatted file so it's always 100% utilized in a sense, I'm sure if someone
has a way to show utilization they'll pipe in
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Peter"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent
It's a dataset logrec
On Wed 28 Nov, 2018, 5:32 PM Carmen Vitullo the dataset or the logstream?
> I've never had a need to know, but maybe a summary report would show ?
> logstream list report possibly ?
>
>
>
> //JS010 EXEC PGM=IXCMIAPU
> //STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.MIGLIB
> //ACCIGN DD DUMMY
the dataset or the logstream?
I've never had a need to know, but maybe a summary report would show ?
logstream list report possibly ?
//JS010 EXEC PGM=IXCMIAPU
//STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.MIGLIB
//ACCIGN DD DUMMY
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD *
DATA TYPE(LOGR) REPORT(YES)
LIST LO
Hi
Is there a way to know the current utilisation of logrec ?
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Kolusu,
There is no mention of OS64_NOSTACK in the text.
Regards, Pierre.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hi
Just went thru Peter Relson presentation
Presentation ״Session 17096” on extended addressability
My question is I guess it’s always better to use a reusable LX With a sequence
number
That’s way if your server goes down the system can assign it to another process
System Service such as St
Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh wrote:
>>"Not really, both Lou and myself referred you to v2.3, your book is v2.1."
>Hold on there, let me put on my nerd glasses 😊
Hahaha. We all in IT are fully trained nerds... ;-D
I hope you could get what you need. Just ask again if you need something.
Groete / Gr
31 matches
Mail list logo
